Skip to content
evidenceevidencephysicalSteven Averybullet DNA test and manipulation controlDuring Day 11 recross-examination, Culhane distinguished DNA introduced into the manipulation control during extraction from the bullet evidence extract. She agreed that, without a deviation permitted by her lab's protocol, her report would have described the bullet DNA result as inconclusive.
← All Evidence
Physical Evidence

bullet DNA test and manipulation control

During Day 11 recross-examination, Culhane distinguished DNA introduced into the manipulation control during extraction from the bullet evidence extract. She agreed that, without a deviation permitted by her lab's protocol, her report would have described the bullet DNA result as inconclusive.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

The protocol deviation determined whether Culhane reported the bullet DNA result rather than describing it as inconclusive; she agreed that without the deviation, her report would have called the result inconclusive.

Trial Record (1)