Skip to content
evidenceevidencetestimonySteven AveryFBI EDTA testing and testimony about detection limitsOn Day 24, Strang cited Arvizu's testimony in arguing that the FBI protocol could identify EDTA when detected but was not designed to confirm its absence. He distinguished a nondetection from proof that no EDTA was present.
← All Evidence
Testimony References

FBI EDTA testing and testimony about detection limits

On Day 24, Strang cited Arvizu's testimony in arguing that the FBI protocol could identify EDTA when detected but was not designed to confirm its absence. He distinguished a nondetection from proof that no EDTA was present.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

In closing argument, Strang used the testing's detection limits to argue that the FBI's failure to detect EDTA did not establish its absence.

Trial Record (1)