Skip to content
Steven Avery & Brendan Dassey— Case Archive
evidenceevidencephysicalSteven AveryRAV4 bloodstains attributed to AveryIn closing argument, defense counsel accepted the identification of Avery's blood in the RAV4 but questioned how it got there. He contrasted the bloodstains with vehicle fingerprints that had not been identified as Avery's and presented planting as a defense theory.
← All Evidence
Physical Evidence

RAV4 bloodstains attributed to Avery

In closing argument, defense counsel accepted the identification of Avery's blood in the RAV4 but questioned how it got there. He contrasted the bloodstains with vehicle fingerprints that had not been identified as Avery's and presented planting as a defense theory.

1 proceeding1 mention1 trial

About

Defense counsel did not dispute the attribution of the identified RAV4 blood to Avery; he argued that the issue was how the blood reached the vehicle.

Trial Record (1)