Skip to content
personpersonLynn ZigmuntLynn ZigmuntManitowoc County clerk of court who explained access to an earlier case file and its blood-vial container.← All People
WitnessManitowoc County Clerk of Court

Lynn Zigmunt

Manitowoc County clerk of court who explained access to an earlier case file and its blood-vial container.

AppearedSteven Avery
229 lines·4 proceedings

About

Lynn Zigmunt, the Manitowoc County clerk of court, testified on Day 17 of Steven Avery's 2007 trial about records from his 1985 case and how its file was stored and accessed. On direct examination, she identified certified records concerning a DNA sample and images of the stored file, shipping package, and blood-vial container. She said the public file-access log began in April 2005 and was applied loosely at first. She recalled an early-2005 visit by James Lenk about evidence storage, but the court sustained an objection when she inferred whether he had entered while she was absent. She did not recognize a displayed log, which the State did not offer as an exhibit.

On cross-examination, Jerome Buting questioned whether sign-in practices and clerks' supervision could account for everyone who handled the file. Zigmunt acknowledged exceptions to the sign-in directive, limits on what clerks could see in the viewing area, and a master key that could open the inner-office door. She could not say whether particular investigators had viewed the file. After the defense played a silent video excerpt of an examination of the blood-vial box, she confirmed visible features but could not tell whether the blood was liquid. The court said the video should speak for itself about the seals.

On redirect, Zigmunt said bailiffs commonly came and went, that she gave them a new inner-office code in January 2006, and that other deputies with business there could be buzzed in by a clerk. She had not watched whether bailiffs used the code. On recross, she agreed the area beyond the door was open but explained that someone going to another clerk's area would turn away from Avery's file. She distinguished the file's usual storage location from a photograph showing it on a viewing desk. The defense linked possible file access to its blood-planting theory, but Zigmunt did not identify anyone who accessed the vial for that purpose.

Trial Record (4)

AverySteven AveryFeb 12, 2007 โ€“ Mar 18, 2007Called by prosecution

Lynn Zigmunt, the Manitowoc County clerk of court, testified in Steven Avery's 2007 trial about his earlier case file and its blood-vial container. She described gaps in access logging and supervision but could not establish who had handled the file for the purpose suggested by the defense.

Day 17

DirectLynn Zigmunt โ€” DirectLynn ZigmuntThomas J. Fallon2highlights84lines spoken

Summary

Lynn Zigmunt authenticated 1985 case-file records and described file storage and access; the court limited her testimony about unobserved visits, then admitted the identified exhibits except an unfamiliar log.

Highlights (2)

evidence eventZigmunt identified certified documents from the 1985 case file concerning the DNA-sample stipulation, order, correspondence, and a later Lab Corp letter.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightZigmunt said she began a file-access sign-in log in April 2005, acknowledged that its early use was lax, and recalled a more inclusive practice by about October 2005.Open in transcript →
CrossLynn Zigmunt โ€” CrossLynn ZigmuntJerome F. Buting1highlight130lines spoken

Summary

Zigmunt described gaps in file sign-in practices and supervision, then reviewed a video of the blood-vial box examination; the court limited her interpretation of its seals.

Highlights (1)

evidence eventThe defense played a silent excerpt of the recorded examination of the blood-vial box. When questioning turned to the appearance of its seals, the court agreed that the exhibit should speak for itself because Zigmunt lacked specialized knowledge.Open in transcript →
RedirectLynn Zigmunt โ€” RedirectLynn ZigmuntThomas J. Fallon1highlight6lines spoken

Summary

Zigmunt clarified what she knew about bailiffs' keys and code access, and said other deputies could enter the inner office when buzzed in by a clerk.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightZigmunt said she had given the bailiffs the inner-office access code when it changed in January 2006, but had not seen whether they used the code and had not given it to other sheriff's department members.Open in transcript →
RecrossLynn Zigmunt โ€” RecrossLynn ZigmuntJerome F. Buting1highlight9lines spoken

Summary

Zigmunt distinguished the file's usual storage location from a viewing-area photograph; the court sustained a scope objection, then admitted Exhibits 468โ€“471 after a witness-order discussion.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightZigmunt agreed that the inner office was open beyond the buzz-in door but distinguished the file's normal storage location from the viewing-area desk shown in a photograph.Open in transcript →