Day 5 - April 20, 2007
Mark Wiegert testified about Brendan Dassey’s interviews, including deceptive questioning, drawings, and the garage search. The judge limited the defense’s proposed use of Dassey’s February 27 answers, and cross-examination continued through adjournment.
Full day summary
2. Mark Wiegert — Direct/Cross (Part 2)
Mark Wiegert testified about Brendan Dassey’s interviews and drawings on Day 5, then faced questions about the timing and consistency of related accounts.
Highlights
Mark Wiegert — DirectadmissionWiegert acknowledged using intentionally false suggestions and claims of superior knowledge during the March 1 interview, describing them as interview techniques.Mark Wiegert — Direct“Well, one of the reasons that we say things that may be not be true, or use deceptive measures, is to see how suggestible he is.”— Mark WiegertWiegert acknowledged deceptive questioning and gave his explanation for using it.Mark Wiegert — Directjury eventBefore the interview DVD was played, the judge instructed jurors to rely on the video rather than captions if the two differed.Mark Wiegert — Directtestimony highlightWiegert said information from the interview was added to a search-warrant application and linked the subsequent garage search to the recovery of two bullets.Mark Wiegert — Crosstestimony highlightComparing Exhibits 208 and 211, Wiegert said the computer-generated depiction drew on both Brendan Dassey's and Jodi Stachowski's statements and acknowledged differences between the two exhibits.
4. Mark Wiegert — Cross (Part 3)
Edelstein questioned Wiegert about Dassey’s interviews and the physical evidence on Day 5; cross-examination remained unfinished at adjournment.
Highlights
Mark Wiegert — Cross-examination resumestestimony highlightUsing the February 27 report and transcript, Edelstein examined assurances and promises made to Dassey. Wiegert acknowledged that investigators sought his trust and that promises were made.Mark Wiegert — Cross-examination resumes“That's absolutely a promise, and I absolutely meant that at the time.”— Mark WiegertWiegert characterized his assurance that investigators would go to bat for Dassey as a genuine promise.Mark Wiegert — Cross-examination resumesadmissionWiegert agreed with Edelstein's question that, apart from the jeans with believed bleach spots, the listed physical items lacked fingerprints, DNA, or other scientific evidence connecting Dassey to Halbach's death. He added that there had been five days to clean up.