Skip to content
personpersonKris Schoenenberger-GrossKris Schoenenberger-GrossSchool psychologist who discussed Brendan Dassey's educational evaluations for the defense.← All People
WitnessMishicot School District

Kris Schoenenberger-Gross

School psychologist who discussed Brendan Dassey's educational evaluations for the defense.

167 lines·4 proceedings·1 mention

About

School psychologist Kris Schoenenberger-Gross testified for the defense in Brendan Dassey's trial on Day 6, identifying his school records and reading from his education and speech-language evaluations. The 2005 speech-language report described difficulties with comprehension, vocabulary, and memory and gave an overall language score of 66. The court overruled the State's relevance objection to testimony about a 2004 individualized education program, while cautioning against repetition from older records.

On cross-examination, Kratz asked what the school records showed about Dassey's abilities and suggestibility. Schoenenberger-Gross said the district did not consider him cognitively disabled and identified average-range thinking and a 2002 math score. She distinguished memory for classroom learning from memory of lived events, which she had not tested. She also said the records did not flag being easily influenced as an area of concern; a teacher's note that Dassey shrugged when he did not know an answer did not say he invented one.

On redirect, Schoenenberger-Gross described a 2002 General Intellectual Ability score of 78 as borderline to below average, a fourth-percentile cognitive efficiency score, and a short-term memory assessment in the well-below-average-to-borderline range. She said Dassey sometimes guessed on uncertain test items and read from a 2005 IEP that placed his reading at an end-of-fourth-grade level while he was in tenth grade. Over the State's objection, the court allowed that IEP questioning and then received the identified school-record exhibits for the reasons they were used.

Trial Record (4)

DasseyBrendan DasseyApr 16, 2007 โ€“ Apr 25, 2007Called by defense

School psychologist Kris Schoenenberger-Gross testified for the defense in Brendan Dassey's trial about school evaluations documenting language, memory, and reading difficulties. On cross-examination, she limited what those records established about his memory of lived events and suggestibility.

Day 6

DirectKris Schoenenberger-Gross โ€” DirectKris Schoenenberger-GrossMark R. Fremgen1highlight73lines spoken

Summary

Schoenenberger-Gross described Brendan Dassey's school records and language assessments; the court allowed testimony about a 2004 IEP over a relevance objection.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightSchoenenberger-Gross identified Brendan's 2005 IEP and read its description of difficulties with clear responses, comprehension, vocabulary, participation, and memory.Open in transcript →
CrossKris Schoenenberger-Gross โ€” CrossKris Schoenenberger-GrossKenneth R. Kratz1highlight67lines spoken

Summary

Kratz tested what Brendan's school records showed about his abilities and suggestibility; Schoenenberger-Gross described average-range scores but limited her conclusions about memory and influence.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightSchoenenberger-Gross described her master's-level training and her work evaluating students and interpreting results.Open in transcript →
RedirectKris Schoenenberger-Gross โ€” RedirectKris Schoenenberger-GrossMark R. Fremgen1highlight27lines spoken

Summary

Schoenenberger-Gross clarified Brendan's 2002 test results and 2005 IEP reading level; the court overruled a reading-level objection and received the school-record exhibits.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightSchoenenberger-Gross identified Exhibit 223 as her October 2002 testing report and described a General Intellectual Ability score of 78 as borderline to below average.Open in transcript →

Day 8