Skip to content
Brendan DasseytranscripttranscriptAnthony O'Neill — Cross/Redirect/Recross (Part 2) - Day 4 - Brendan DasseyDetective Anthony O'Neill's Day 4 testimony addressed investigators' statements and questions during Brendan Dassey's November 6 interview. The court then received defense exhibits and an agreed stipulation about Teresa Halbach's AutoTrader work.
Thomas J. FallonKenneth R. KratzRaymond L. EdelsteinMark R. FremgenJerome L. FoxAnthony O'NeillMR. EDELSTEINAnthony O'NeillMR. FALLONTHE COURTCourt ReporterMR. FREMGENCourt ClerkMR. KRATZcrossredirectrecross
Brendan Dassey/Day 4/April 19, 2007
6 pages·4 witnesses·1,626 lines
Pevytoe and Eisenberg testified about burned remains, while O'Neill faced questions about his recorded interview of Brendan Dassey. The jury also heard stipulated accounts, and Wiegert began testimony about Kayla Avery's reports to investigators.
CrossCrossAnthony O'Neill — Cross Anthony O'Neill Raymond L. Edelstein

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY EDELSTEIN:

MR. EDELSTEIN: Detective O'Neill, you spent about an hour and twenty minutes with Brendan during the course of this contact on the 6th of November; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'd have to take a lot out of that from being in and out of the car, but, in totality, myself, Detective Baldwin, that's correct.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And Skorlinski was there as well?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: For about, I think, the last five minutes, if that was about right.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. This had been some time back; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, November 6.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Of what year?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Two-thousand five.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right, 2005. It's a while back; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Before coming to testify today, did you have an opportunity to discuss with anyone, um, the -- your testimony to help you be prepared for this jury?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, I discussed with the attorneys, uh, that I read the transcripts, uh, some of the points that they asked me about in the transcripts. On the way down here, I listened to both audio recordings. It's a two-hour drive for me. Uh, tried to bring myself up to speed, of course, because of the, uh -- the time, and, uh, also other things and matters that we have going on in Marinette County, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm sorry? What about Marinette?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Other things that we have going on. Other cases and so forth. So I try to refresh myself with the attorneys, as well as my own records. Uh, the audios.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I don't want to get confused now. On the way -- are you talking about on the way down here you talked with these attorneys about things happening in Marinette?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No. Outside of your question about if I had talked to anybody about what I was going to say today?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I mentioned I'd spoke to the attorneys today.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: And then, also, I reviewed my notes and the audio recordings on the way down here.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you speak with any of the other officers who were involved in the investigation in this particular case?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe I spoke to Detective Baldwin.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did the, uh -- Did you and Baldwin come down together?

MR. EDELSTEIN: But you talked to Baldwin prior to testifying here today?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, you knew that the girl's name, about whom everyone was concerned, was Teresa Halbach; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you knew that the information was that the last place she was seen was at the Avery Salvage Yard; is that right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: That's how it was reported. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you knew the date that she was last there; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Prior to speaking with Brendan, had you spoken with Steven Avery?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Charles Avery?

MR. EDELSTEIN: The grandfather?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And that was there at the cabin; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And that was actually the day before?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: For the most part, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: What do you mean the "most part"?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I spoke to them -- Steven Avery on Sunday. I believe I spoke to his dad on Sunday. His mom on Sunday, as well. I mean, there were various people I spoke to on both dates.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. But you had been in and out of the -- the cabin property a number of times over at least two days?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: On two occasions. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Prior to talking with Brendan?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Brendan wasn't the first one you talked to?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you were in contact with, uh, agents from DCI; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: On a sporadic basis, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you have daily contact over the course of the two days with, uh, Skorlinski?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I spoke to him a couple times. Maybe four.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Had -- How many times had you personally met with Skorlinski before you spoke to Brendan?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And where was that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe he came up on Saturday night, and I would have met him then, and then, also, on Sunday morning.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Prior to stopping the Pontiac and talking with Brendan?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And the two of you, along with others, including, uh, Baldwin, for example, you kind of laid the game plan out as far as who was going to talk to which of the boys; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Um, it was spontaneous, but we decided that we'd talk to them since we had the opportunity, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Well, the truth of the matter is, you had the opportunity over at the cabin to talk to him if you wanted to, didn't you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And why was that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: We were pretty busy, and we just didn't get to him.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You stopped the Pontiac on what day of the week?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And what time did you do your last interview on, um, the day before? On Saturday?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It definitely was sunset.

MR. EDELSTEIN: It was a pretty important case, isn't it?

MR. EDELSTEIN: I don't mean to give you a hard time, but you can work past sunset, can't you? You live in the county? You know your way around?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Well, what kind of case are you referring to at the point that I was dealing with it, sir?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, on that Saturday night, you're working with, uh, what you understand to be a, um -- certainly, at a very minimum, a missing persons case; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, to my understanding and clarity that day it was a missing person case, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And was it important to make contact with individuals who may have had the last contact with this girl?

MR. EDELSTEIN: That's why you were there Saturday?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you talked with a bunch of people that Saturday, but you left out -- what you're telling the jury, you left out about sunset?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe so, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you inquire on that Saturday as to the whereabouts of Brendan when you were at the Avery property?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm sure I knew he was there.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm sure I knew he was there.

MR. EDELSTEIN: So what stopped you from talking to him on Saturday?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Because up until the point of where we got on Sunday there was no need to talk to him.

MR. EDELSTEIN: So you say up to a point on Sunday. What happened between Saturday evening and Sunday?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: About 12 hours.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, can you be a little more specific? What happened that caused you, besides the -- the lapse of 12 hours time, that you deemed it important at this point to talk with Brendan?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Brendan was not the last person reported to see Teresa Halbach. Let's --

MR. EDELSTEIN: Let me ask you this --

ANTHONY O'NEILL: -- start -- I'm trying to answer your question.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Go ahead.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Okay? We talked to various people in the family, we spoke -- spoke to family members, and, basically, gave an order of importance, and Brendan came up on Sunday.

MR. EDELSTEIN: When did you exactly learn that the bus driver reported passing that area at roughly 3:45 on the 31st? You knew that on Saturday, didn't you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I did not.

MR. EDELSTEIN: When did you learn it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: On Sunday when Agent Skorlinski and I conferred outside the vehicle, uh, when Brendan was being interviewed.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, you had -- What was your purpose in going over there on Sunday?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe, uh, the purpose was the search warrants for the vehicles.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Besides learning from -- Was Brendan already in your police vehicle when you learned from Skorlinski that this information had been developed about the bus driver?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And during the course of this hour and twenty minutes, do you know when that was?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I may, but I want to back up just, uh, two questions before.

MR. EDELSTEIN: No. I -- I'd rather you answer my question. The Government will get --

MR. EDELSTEIN: their chance.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I think it was about a third of the way into the interview. I think it was pretty obvious, during the audio part, where I got out of the vehicle, came back and asked him the question about the, uh -- how many people were on the bus, and the bus driver, and so forth.

MR. EDELSTEIN: So you believe it was about the time you asked him the question about the number of individuals on the bus as far as the -- where that information came to you during the course of the hour and twenty minutes?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, Skorlinski is the one who actually made application for and obtained the search warrant for Steve Avery's Pontiac; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'd have to see a copy of the search warrant, but I believe so.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you know when that occurred?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: The execution of the search warrant?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, the seizure of the vehicle was on Sunday. I don't know when I actually did the search of the vehicles.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Do you know when Skorlinski actually got the warrant?

MR. FALLON: Objection. Relevance.

THE COURT: Overruled.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, no, I do not.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) But you know it was before Sunday; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't recall.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Detective, obviously, you filed and prepared some reports as a result of your activity in this case; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you testified earlier that you had reviewed some of your notes, uh, to help refresh your memory for purposes of testifying?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: The transcript and the audio recordings I did.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. I thought that -- I thought you said your notes.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I probably did, but it was a transcript and the audio files. I don't recall that I actually looked at the report, although I had a copy of it in my folder.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you look at any notes that you made of your activities, which you would ordinarily make, to help you prepare reports, for example?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Not recently, no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Would those notes indicate when you learned that Skorlinski had obtained the search warrant for the Pontiac automobile?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'd have to review the reports.

MR. EDELSTEIN: The report or your notes?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't have notes. There's a report that I produced.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, before -- Are you the one who actually stopped the Pontiac automobile?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I'm not.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you know who did?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe Deputy Degnitz.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And what time was that?

COURT REPORTER: Could you spell his last name, please?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: D-e-g-n-i-t-z. Before noon.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Can you be more specific?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I got there -- I think I re -- put down, like, 11:50, so shortly before that. We were only maybe half a mile away.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So if -- if your report says at about 11:55 a.m. you and Baldwin, uh, met with Degnitz on Parkway, that would -- you wouldn't take issue with that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: After he made the stop we did. I don't -- I don't know.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Had he already stopped the Pontiac?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And who's the one that directed him to stop the Pontiac?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe, uh, one of the officers. Either myself, Detective Baldwin, or Agent Skorlinski.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you don't remember if you were the one who -- This -- this is a deputy within your department; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you can't tell us who -- whether you have an independent memory of telling one of your own deputies in your department to stop a vehicle where you have a search warrant?

MR. FALLON: Objection. Relevance.

THE COURT: I -- I'm going to sustain that objection. Move on.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) So to the best of your recollection, was the vehicle stopped by the time you got there?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And I believe you testified that you and Baldwin took Brendan into your vehicle; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: We asked him if he would talk to us in my vehicle. He said, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: What happened to his brother?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: He went and talked to Agent Skorlinski in his vehicle.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Was it just Skorlinski over in his car?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I think Skorlinski also had a partner. I -- Her name escapes me. I only met her once.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is that the one referred to in your report as Deb, paren, unsure last name?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe so. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Now, before you -- You had never met Brendan; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Other than the fact that he was related, perhaps, to Steven Avery or some of the other members of the Avery family that you had visited with the day before, you -- you didn't know anything at all about him, did you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you know how old he was?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And where did you get that information?

MR. EDELSTEIN: No. I'm talking about before you talked with him?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: If I had it before I talked to him, perhaps from Steven when he was telling me about who he come up with and who there were -- who was all present, perhaps.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Steven didn't tell you that he came up there in the -- with his nephew accompanying him, did he?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You didn't know what grade he was in?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't recall what grade he was in.

MR. EDELSTEIN: No. I'm asking you, did you know, prior to making contact with him on Sunday, November 6, what grade he was in?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You didn't know what school he went to, did you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You had no idea whether you were dealing with what we would -- what you might typically call an average teenager or a teenager with any type of limitations, is that a fair statement?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You had no idea about, uh, his ability -- what his memory skills were, did you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Before our conversation, no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Correct. You had no idea about his ability to perceive and understand, um, language; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Before our conversation, no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Is it fair to say that during the course of your conversation with him, that you came to the conclusion that, um, he did have some difficulty sometimes understanding the question that was being asked of him?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't agree with that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I don't.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Mr. Fallon asked you about his demeanor. You had never been around this young man before, had you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I had not.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You had no idea what he acted like when he was playing a video game, for example?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Had no idea what he acted like when he was dealing, uh, with a teacher, for example?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You had no idea what he acted like when he was dealing with a person like yourself? Of a -- an authoritative figure?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Prior to our conversation, no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you told him you were a police officer; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Before he got into the police cruiser that you were driving, which I guess is unmarked; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It's a Ford Taurus like what any other person may have in their garage.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. There's no cage in the back?

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. How much time elapsed from the time of the stop until you got him into the backseat of your Taurus?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: From the time that I arrived there?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Couple minutes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. You had some conversation with him before he got in there? I'm talking about the back of your car.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Other than introducing myself, asking him if he'd like to come in --

ANTHONY O'NEILL: -- to talk to me in the car, that's about it.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So he agreed, sure, I'm going to come over, and you guys direct him into the backseat? You're in the front, Baldwin's on the passenger side --

MR. EDELSTEIN: -- correct? Okay. And you've got this audio, um, recorder -- digital audio recorder stuck, you said, in a visor? Which one was it in? Right or left?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: The visor caddy? In the driver's side visor.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Was it visible?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You didn't tell him it was there, did you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You first asked him something to the effect, last Monday, do you remember seeing this girl at all? Did you have a photograph that you showed him?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe we did. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: What became of that photograph?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't know. I think you'd have to ask Detective Baldwin.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you get that from someone in Calumet County? If you know.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't know.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is it fair to say that you, as well as Baldwin, were not pleased with the answers you received to some of your inquiries?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I can't say that. Are you asking if his answers were suspect? Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, I assume if somebody gives you what you consider to be a suspect answer, it's not going to please you, is it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Well, the idea that someone gives me an answer, it's not supposed to please me. I -- I just don't base it on, does it please me or not.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I mean, I don't --

ANTHONY O'NEILL: want to mince words, but --

THE COURT: One at a time.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) As an investigator, you're trying to get information?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And it's important to get the right information?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Truthful information.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, if it's truthful, it would be right, wouldn't it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: If it pleases you.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, do you believe that untruthful information is sometimes right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It may please some people.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm not asking about pleasure. I'm asking how you perceived to be information. If it's truthful, it's right; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Yes, I agree with that.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And if it's not truthful, it's not right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It doesn't please me.

MR. EDELSTEIN: 'It does not please you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Very good. Thank you. And you believed you were getting, at certain points during the course of this hour and twenty minutes, what you believed to be untruthful information; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And that did not please you; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I took no pleasure.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you think your displeasure was evident to Brendan?

MR. FALLON: Your Honor, I -- I'm going to interpose an objection. The question is not pleasure or displeasure. I -- I just object to the characterization to the line of inquiry. Uh, let's -- Eith --Either it's information that they thought suspect or not suspect and what they did. That's what's relevant, not displeasure.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Your Honor, if I might respond?

THE COURT: Go ahead.

MR. EDELSTEIN: This witness has testified about the demeanor of the defendant. Those are subjective characterizations that he places upon reactions. I believe we are entitled to inquire of this witness what actions he may have taken, whether he showed displeasure, his feelings, as that, obviously, may have affected how the defendant reacted. This jury is entitled to evaluate that for themselves.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I don't believe that this is beyond the scope.

THE COURT: You -- You're now reaching at -- at framing a question that seems to ask, do you think he reacted in a way to a question you might have asked, Detective, because you evinced some displeasure? At least that's where I hear you going, and I -- and I'm not -- I'm not sure that -- that, uh, this witness is competent to -- to be making that evaluation -- that -- that substantive evaluation about -- about the defendant.

Um, can you recast the question?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Let me try it this way, Judge. Maybe we can save a little time.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Detective, I guess you would agree with me that you -- you have no degrees of any sort, education, or training, which gives you any specific authoritative ability to evaluate, um, why an individual may react to you in the way they do? Is that a fair statement? You're not a psychologist?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm not a psychologist. That's correct.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And certainly not a child psychologist?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I am not a child psychologist. That's correct.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. How far into the interview that took about an hour and twenty minutes, um, did you become confrontational with Brendan?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I wasn't confrontational with him.

MR. EDELSTEIN: May I approach, Your Honor?

THE COURT: Go ahead.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Detective, if you would, and ignore all the colorful marks on here, does this look to be -- these two pages look to be -- or three pages, I'm sorry, look to be a copy of the official supplemental report from the Marinette County Sheriff's Office, Investigative Division, that you prepared?

MR. EDELSTEIN: That's a yes?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And for reference numbers for the record, it's Complaint 0-5-4-1-2-0; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And I'm making reference to page one of three right now?

MR. FALLON: Would you guys just talk into the mike just for our juror here?

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) If you would, take a look at the first paragraph of page two of your report and just read that to yourself. Does that help you, uh -- If I asked you the same question again about what time during the course of this hour and twenty minutes you got confrontational, would it change your answer?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you not write, when I confronted Brendan?

MR. EDELSTEIN: For the record, this has been marked as, uh, Exhibit 202; is that right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: This is the same report we were just talking about?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, outside of the highlighting and circumstances, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, you wrote in that report that you confronted Brendan; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Confronted. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is that different than my understanding of being confrontational?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Help me out. Explain it to me. Explain it to this jury.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Confrontational is more a presence of mind and demeanor. Confronted is questioning or, uh, having a person explain. I confronted him about his answer. I called him on it. I asked him about it. Why did you tell me this when you said this? Confrontational --

MR. EDELSTEIN: And which -- And which ---

THE COURT: Just -- Just a moment. He was -- he was going to finish the answer. Allow him to finish please. Go ahead.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Confrontational would suggest the demeanor that I had when interviewing Brendan, and that was not correct statement that she had in asking why I was confrontational with him when I was not confrontational with him.

COURT REPORTER: Can you -- I'm sorry.

THE COURT: Yeah. You --

COURT REPORTER: Would you slow down, please? I'm having a hard time understanding you.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I did not have a confrontational conversation with Brendan Dassey. I confronted him, or questioned him, or called him on one of his answers that he gave that was not consistent with what he was telling us before.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) And which answer was that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Multiple. Uh, things -- Specific one that's related to in the report was the, uh, school bus.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Were you present -- If -- If you know, who was the first one to ask Brendan, if anyone, be it you, Baldwin, or Skorlinski, whether or not he remembered anybody taking photographs of the van?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe it was me.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you were present when Baldwin said, you remember that girl taking that picture. You're getting off the bus. It's a beautiful day. Were you there when -- during that exchange?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe that was me. Not Baldwin, was it?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, in any event, you remember it; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. You're getting off the bus. It's a beautiful day. It's daylight. And everybody sees her, comma, you do, too. Did you mean to suggest to him that these are facts that he should affirm by the way you asked that question?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'd have to see it in its full context, because I know a couple times I asked him about seeing her on the bus, and that may have been a reaffirming question to him. I'm not certain as to where it is in the transcript.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I think you told us already that you did have a chance to review the transcript from the audio?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Can you take a look at what I have in front of you here? Does this look to be a copy of that transcript?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Directing your attention to page 17 at the bottom where it's indicated, Detective Baldwin, yeah, you remember that girl. That portion? You thought maybe you said that? But if this indicates Baldwin, do you have any problem with it? Do you remember who said it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: From the area you're representing inside the transcript, uh, Detective Baldwin.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And would you agree with me that this is really the first time, during the course of the conversation, where somebody suggests to him the girl's taking pictures?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Could you repeat the question, please?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You had asked him about taking the pictures earlier?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And you were the first one who brought that up?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Then there was some follow-up by Baldwin; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: By myself and then Baldwin.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. But during the time that you first brought it up -- Or, I'm sorry. That -- Yeah, that you first brought it up, and then when Baldwin brought it up, the question being, from yourself, the girl taking pictures. You remember that. Okay. Would you agree that that's how it was asked?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: After the initial one, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you asked him in that fashion?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: After the initial -- initial affirmation by Dassey that he did see the girl taking pictures, that next inquiry was what you said.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You indicated after his initial affirmation that he saw the girl taking pictures. Help me out and show me where that is -- precedes that in the transcript?

MR. FALLON: Are we still on page 17, gentlemen?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Okay. Baldwin's comments were after my initial asking him about the girl taking pictures.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) All right. So you were incorrect when you said it was after his initial affirmation of seeing the girl take pictures?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: That's correct.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Well, nobody's perfect. We all make mistakes. Won't hold that against you. So you're the first one that really brought it up?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. As long as I'm here, so I don't have to chase back and forth, between the first time you brought it up, you make the statement that's -- it's not on -- not everyday somebody's taking pictures of a van; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: The question then becomes, how many people are on the bus?

MR. EDELSTEIN: He answers the question; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: The next question, as far as taking pictures, comes from you. The girl taking pictures. You remember that. Right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. He says, well, I wasn't looking at. And then it looks like he was interrupted; right?

MR. FALLON: I -- I would object to that characterization. I think the, uh, tape, itself, will speak another explanation.

THE COURT: Yeah. The -- the tape is the -- is the best evidence here. I'11 sustain the objection.

MR. EDELSTEIN: That's fine.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) In -- in any event, there's no answer to that? He does not affirm or deny what you're asserting; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: According to the transcript, the written part, there is no specific answer to it.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And if this is based upon the video everybody just saw, and you com -- I -- did -- had -- did you ever personally compare this to the -- to the audio?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And it's accurate?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: To a point it can be, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: But he never either affirmed or denied what you first suggested to him about the girl taking the pictures?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: He does state that they -- he saw the girl taking pictures.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Not until it's brought up again, especially in this ex -- right in this little exchange, next, not by yourself, but by Baldwin?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And his answer was, maybe. I don't know. Right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Initial copy, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And that's when Baldwin said, Brendan, come on, as if to suggest that Brendan was withholding something?

MR. EDELSTEIN: If you're disappointed about something, Detective, would you be displeased?

MR. FALLON: Objection. Relevance.

THE COURT: That's sustained.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Did you not --

MR. FALLON: As to the form anyways.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) You told him, did you not, Brendan, and I quote, you're not going to. disappoint us. Do you remember telling him that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you remember asking him, did you see her standing there taking a picture?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Counsel, I'm on page 18.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) And he -- he did answer, yeah?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And then you -- did you immediately thereafter ask him -- and if -- if you don't remember, I'll come back, but did you ask him, why didn't you tell me that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm going to save you a trip. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you suggested to him the reason that he, perhaps, didn't tell you that, was that he was scared? Because you phrased it as, are you scared? Right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm not sure if it was in response to him saying he was afraid or if, by itself, I just said, are you scared?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is there some reason you didn't offer up as an explanation for his failure or inability to answer your earlier question that, perhaps, he has a bad memory?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I didn't have that opinion.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You didn't know anything about him other than the brief contact you had that morning; correct?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, nothing before our conversation to suggest to me that he had a bad memory.

MR. FREMGEN: Just one moment, Judge.

MR. FREMGEN: Judge, if I may, it's 3:00. I believe Mr. Edelstein still has some significant amount of cross, and the State will have a couple of questions. Court want to take a break?

THE COURT: Sure. Uh, we'll break until 3:20.

(Recess had at 3:03 p.m.)

(Reconvened at 3:27 p.m.)

THE COURT: Counsel, you may resume.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Detective O'Neill, during the course of one hour and twenty minutes, roughly, would you agree or disagree with me that both, yourself, as well as Skorlinski and Baldwin, told Brendan that you believed that he was being told what to say?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: We brought that up, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. And when you say you brought it up, you, basically, flat out told him, you're being told what to say. Right? If -- if it'll help speed it along, Detective, I think that Mr. Fallon brought over --

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It was brought up. That's correct.

MR. EDELSTEIN: What's been marked as 203, does that look to be a copy of the transcript that we were looking at before?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Same one that you compared to the audio?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And best you know, that's accurate?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Can you tell this jury how many times between you, Skorlinski, and Baldwin that that assertion was presented -- sor -- to Brendan?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe we asked him, uh, at least two, probably three, times, uh, whether or not he was told to say something.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Can you tell this jury how many times during the course of an hour and twenty minutes interview that you had with Brendan that lies were told to him by either you, Skorlinski, or Baldwin?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you turn to page 33, please? Toward the bottom of that, uh, specifically, Detective Baldwin, the statement is made to Brendan, quote, she needs medicine -- medicines on a daily basis, okay? Do you see where I'm talking about?

MR. EDELSTEIN: It's not true, was it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It's standard deception practice used by investigators.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Well, I don't want to go down the please, displease rows again, but can you tell me the difference between standard -- That what you said? Standard deception practices and a lie?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I didn't say lie. Deceptive practices that we may utilize as far as what responses we get from the question.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you agree with me that a lie is something that's not true?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: If there's a benefit gained that's ill will, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm sorry. Could you repeat your answer?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: If you could repeat your question?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm sorry, I just -- You're asking about a lie and if this was a lie?

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm trying to understand whether -- when you used the phrase "deceptive practices" --

MR. EDELSTEIN: -- whether -- Let me ask it this way. In your business, does a deceptive practice contain intentionally false information that is conveyed to another person?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It's allowable to use some trickery and deceit.

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm not asking what's allowable. I'm asking what it is?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Something in the idea of what we had asked him concerning the medications that she would need. Yes.

THE COURT: You -- you're not answering the question, Detective. Would you reask it, please?

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Did -- Did you understand my question?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: If you're asking me if I lied -- or if Detective Baldwin lied to him, I'd say no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. When the statement was made to Brendan, quote, she needs medicine on a daily basis, you acknowledge that the statement was made; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you acknowledge, also, that when it was made, neither you nor Baldwin had any basis for believing that that was a true statement; isn't that also correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. You, Baldwin, and Skorlinski implored him to tell you the truth; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: In addition to the deceptive practice, lie, misrepresentation, however you want to characterize it, about the medicine, it was also suggested to Brendan, in a similar fashion, that his brother was looking out the kitchen window. Do you recall that?

THE COURT: Do you have a page for that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: I'll have to find it, Judge. I know it's in here.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Page 30, please? You see at the bottom there, Detective, uh, by Baldwin, you and your brother both? It's the third entry from the bottom.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. It recites, you and your brother both sat there and looked out the window at her. Right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You and -- You had no basis for believing that to be true, did you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I didn't make that statement.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I can't say for that statement.

MR. EDELSTEIN: right. You were in and out of the vehicle during this hour and twenty minutes; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Um, it was November. Do you remember what the temperature was that day?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It was cool.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Give me a range. If -- if you don't remember, that's fine.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I would say close to 35 to 40.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Was the heater on in your vehicle?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I don't recall.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you remember if Baldwin turned it off because Brendan asked him to? Or turned it down?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Not while I was in the vehicle.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So if it happened, it might have happened when you were out talking to Skorlinski?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It may have. I don't --

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. When you got out, that's what you were doing, weren't you? You were going back to talk to Skorlinski?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: For the most part, yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you were sort of reporting into Skorlinski what the progress was as far as, uh, gaining any information from Brendan; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Sometimes. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Do you know how many times that you told Brendan that he was not telling the truth?

MR. EDELSTEIN: But you acknowledge that it happened on multiple occasions during the course of this hour and twenty minutes; right?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It may have. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well -- Now, you testified on direct that I think when Mr. Fallon first started having you explain your involvement in this matter, I believe you said the information that you had was minimal. Do you remember that testimony?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Um, but, actually, you had certainly not every piece of information but you knew more than just name, rank, and serial number, so to speak, didn't you? You had some very --

MR. FALLON: Objection.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) -- specific details?

MR. FALLON: Name, rank and serial number is -- is vague.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. That's fine.

THE COURT: Rephrase that, please.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) For example, Detective, you knew that a vehicle had been found on the Avery property?

MR. EDELSTEIN: And you knew that that vehicle, uh, had been checked by a registration, and VIN, and all that, and that it was Teresa Halbach's?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: There was presumptive that it was. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So you -- you presumed that that was, in fact, the case?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: (No verbal response.)

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. And, in addition to that, you also knew that, uh, the vehicle had been, in some respect, uh, apparently, concealed?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. You knew that Teresa Halbach worked as a freelance photographer; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You knew that she worked, uh, with the AutoTrader Magazine.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You knew that she had, uh, been at the Avery property, or was scheduled to be at the Avery property, on the 31st of October?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You knew a bus driver had reported seeing her at the Avery property on the 3lst of October?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: That Sunday. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Any other particular details that you may have known where we can judge whether your answer on the minimal is a good one or a bad one?

MR. FALLON: Objection. Argumentative.

THE COURT: Uh, sustained.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) You testified -- If you'll bear with -- with me a second, I need to find this in the transcript. You testified that you made no sort of promises to him; right? Do you recall that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you make any promises to him?

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Detective, just so I don't have to go through each individual present, did -- did you, or either Skorlinski or Baldwin, in your presence, make any promises to Brendan?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Outside telling him he was free to leave, no.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Didn't someone tell him that, um, no matter what he said, or something to that effect, that he was not going to jail?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: He brought up the idea that he was afraid that we'd take him to jail. I remember that.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Directing your attention to page 36. At the bottom. Four lines up.

MR. EDELSTEIN: You said, okay, why did you not tell us the truth about when you saw her leaving? Answer: I was scared. Right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is there some reason -- Well, if -- What was the very next thing that you said in response to his assertion he was scared?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Okay. Let's get beyond being scared.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Let me stop you right there. So you wanted to get beyond this issue of being scared. Is there some reason you didn't explore that more if your goal is to gather as much information to get to the truth of what happened? Why it happened? Who did what?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Why did you tell him, then, okay, let's get beyond being scared?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Because we had to deal with that part of it.

MR. EDELSTEIN: With what? I'm sorry.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: We had to deal with his fear. That part if he was scared about something. Let's get beyond being scared.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, I take that to mean that -- Let me ask you this: Isn't it true that during the course of the hour -- hour and twenty minutes, despite him saying several times he was scared, you, Skorlinski, or Baldwin never really inquired any further about that? What were you scared of? Why were you scared? When did you become scared? You never -- You guys never had -- went into that, did you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I think it was covered several times in the audio. What are you afraid of, Brendan? I -- I think I remember those words, specifically.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Well --

MR. EDELSTEIN: Maybe we'll find that in a second. I don't want to get off 36, though, but let's go back to this issue of promises. At the second to the last entry on that page, Detective, right after getting past being scared, um, what does -- you told him, in fact, um, get beyond the idea of getting in trouble and going to jail because that's not going to happen. That's what you told him; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Isn't that a promise? Aren't you promising him that he's not going to jail?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I told him he didn't have to talk to me and he was free to leave. There was no --

MR. EDELSTEIN: Doesn't answer my question. Did you tell him he wasn't -- that -- quote, going to jail because that's not going to happen? Did you or did you not tell him that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you construe that as a promise to him?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is it fair to say that during the course of the interview, that you or the others suggest to him, uh, potential reasons why Teresa could be missing? For example, an accident?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is it fair to say that during the course of the interviews, that you, Skorlinski, or Baldwin suggested to him alternatives, uh, such as mistake?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you probe into Brendan when he indicated that sometimes he gets shy when he's talking to people he doesn't know?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: At the end of the interview? No.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Would it be fair to -- to characterize that -- during the course of the interview, that the three of you, at various times, attempted to increase the emotional feeling of guilt in the mind of Brendan Dassey?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I apologize, but would you repeat that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you agree or disagree with me that during the course of the hour and twenty minutes that you, Baldwin, Skorlinski spent with Brendan Dassey, that there was a conscious effort to increase in his mind his belief and feeling of guilt?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Could you go to page 40?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Yes, please. Fifth entry from the bottom? You were there, and Baldwin said as follows: You feel guilty right now that you didn't help that girl. Correct? You see where I'm talking about?

MR. EDELSTEIN: I see the glasses you got during the break.

MR. EDELSTEIN: In fact, the very next statement made by an officer, and I'm just jumping down two lines there, again, as Baldwin, where he says, I can see in your eyes that you feel terrible about something. Right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Is that not a -- Did -- Did you and Skorlinski ever discuss, uh, how you might appeal to or cause Brendan to think that he was guilty of something in order to try to get some information?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, you indicated you made no notes at the time of the interview; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You produced, uh, the supplement report that we talked about, uh, sometime after that; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: So if it was dated 11/11, about five days later?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And you didn't use your handy dandy little digital recorder that you had up on the visor to make notes of this interaction with Brendan on the way back to either, uh, your home, or wherever you left when you did leave, uh, to help you prepare the report; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: So you're having to rely entirely upon your memory when you described his demeanor; correct?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And that's about 16 months ago; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. But you acknowledge there's nothing at all in your report about his demeanor?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Isn't it true that the first individual to state or suggest that Teresa Halbach went into the Steve Avery trailer was a police officer, as far as your interactions with Brendan on this date?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So it's not something that he came up with in response to a question, that, well, for example, I saw her when I got off the bus and I saw her go into the house?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. That notion or that concept was promoted to him, uh, somewhat of a theme throughout this interview, wasn't it?

MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't agree with that?

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. But you acknowledge that it was a police officer who first brought that alleged fact up?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Brought the question to him.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. In fact, it happened more than once, didn't it? That very notion that she went into the trailer?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe the question was brought through more than once. Yes.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you understand the difference between an open-ended question and a leading question, don't you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Every time that that concept was brought up, i.e., she went into the trailer, it was done ina leading and suggestive fashion; agree or disagree?

MR. FALLON: I'm going to object to that question. It's, um, vague as asked. There's a specific legal definition for a leading question under the Sarinske case, and then there's a whole psychological concept. So I -- I don't know what we're doing here, but I --

THE COURT: Well, you're objecting -- You -- You're objecting to the foundation, I -- I take it, and -- and --

MR. FALLON: Foundation and the manner --

MR. FALLON: -- in which the question is asked.

THE COURT: All right. Objection is sustained.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Just let me do it this way.

MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) When you're conducting an interview, you oftentimes lead the interviewee; correct? Know what I'm saying, don't you?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Well, I believe I do, except that, as Mr. Fallon suggested and brought forward, your definition and mine is different.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Your -- your perception of leading question and what I may use as a question is different.

MR. EDELSTEIN: If a question suggests the answer, do you think it's leading?

MR. EDELSTEIN: During the course of the contact with Brendan, when he was questioned, if he's asked the question, and I make reference, for example, to page 31, about halfway down, Brendan, she went into that trailer, didn't she? Is that a leading question or is it not a leading question?

MR. EDELSTEIN: It is a leading question?

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. That's all for now. Thank you.

THE COURT: Any redirect, Counsel?

MR. FALLON: Yes, a few questions. Thank you.

RedirectRedirectAnthony O'Neill — Redirect Anthony O'Neill Thomas J. Fallon

REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY FALLON:

MR. FALLON: Counsel asked you about promises, inducements. For you, as a detective, did you make any promises or inducements to Mr. Dassey in order to get him to speak with you?

MR. FALLON: All right. And, now, is that the concept of promise that you had in your mind in response to Counsel's question on promises?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, it is not.

MR. FALLON: No, I mean the concept. When he asked you about promises, you said you made no promises. Is that what you meant when you said, no, we didn't make any promises?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Asked and answered and suggestive, Your Honor.

MR. FALLON: He's clarifying -- First of all, under 906.11 (c), a leading question in redirect examination to clarify a point -- clarify a point on cross-examination is permitted.

Number two, this witness clearly has just indicated he was uncertain as to the nature of my question, and I'm attempting to restructure and direct it.

THE COURT: That's fair. Uh, you may ask the question in that -- in that fashion.

MR. FALLON: (By Attorney Fallon) Do you understand?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm trying to. I believe that, uh, got a little confused with what he was trying to explain before, my difference of it, and I'll try to get back on track as to what my reason was. Go ahead, sir.

MR. FALLON: All right. When he was asking you what a promise is, what did you understand him to mean? Let's get at it that way.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, promises that I wouldn't do this in exchange for that.

MR. FALLON: All right. Now, you did make promises to him during the interview? For instance, you promised to take him home?

MR. FALLON: All right. And you said he could leave if he wanted to?

MR. FALLON: All right. Now, let's talk a little bit about, um, the statement, uh, the deceptive practice, regarding the need for medical attention. You indicated that that was a common practice in a missing persons case. Tell us about that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It's probative-type questions.

MR. FALLON: What do you hope to gain? I mean, what's the idea behind suggesting that somebody may have a medical need when you're trying to locate -- Why do you ask that?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Being probative. If his answers would have been something to the effect, well, I think I could help her, or, I really want to see her get medication, or, I don't think she needs it now. It give us an idea. You know, trying to determine as to whether or not, is she alive? Is she injured? Is she not?

MR. FALLON: All right. Would it be fair to say you were appealing to a sense of emotion on the part of a person?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Probing into that venue, yes.

MR. FALLON: Um, Counsel also asked, um, about you -- your efforts, and Detective Baldwin's efforts, to suggest that, perhaps, Teresa was, uh, in Steven Avery's trailer. Do you recall that?

MR. FALLON: All right. And I believe you indicated that that, um, tact was taken on more than one occasion in the interview?

MR. FALLON: All right. At any point did Mr. Dassey adopt that and say, yeah, that happened?

MR. FALLON: So he resisted that suggestion?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Very firmly.

MR. FALLON: Um, you were asked about a picture. Do you know if you had a picture of the missing persons, um, report, a poster, or a card?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I'm trying to recall, but I think -- We had a missing person case a month before. Wisconsin has a website. I think we might have yanked a picture or a poster off of it...

MR. FALLON: All right. So you can't recall, particularly, this case versus the last case, the missing person you worked on, as to which picture you may have had?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I can't. But I think Detective Baldwin could clear this -- that up.

MR. FALLON: All right. Um, I'm going to have another photograph marked and, uh, shown to you.

(Exhibit 204 marked for identification.)

MR. FALLON: (By Attorney Fallon) Do you recognize the people which are depicted in that photograph?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, yes, I do.

MR. FALLON: And who -- who is depicted in that photograph?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Steven Avery, Brendan Dassey, I think it's Al Avery, and Al's wife, Mrs. Avery, I think Carol? Barb? That's her.

MR. FALLON: All right. And, um, are those the individuals that you spoke with on Saturday and Sunday, November 5 and November 6?

MR. FALLON: All right. And, now, Counsel asked you questions about, um, uh, leaving the property so early. In other words, sunset on Saturday evening. What caused you to leave Saturday evening?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Mr. Avery, Al Avery, was, uh, intoxicated, and riding around in a golf cart, and told us to get off his property or he'd shoot us.

MR. FALLON: All right. So you left?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: We left the Avery property and just maintained on the road.

MR. FALLON: All right. And, thus, you resumed your investigation the next day?

MR. FALLON: All right. And the next day was Mr. Avery more receptive?

MR. FALLON: All right. And cooperative?

MR. FALLON: All right. And, thus, you were able to continue with the, um, investigation on Sunday?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: With the interview of Steven Avery, initially, yes.

MR. FALLON: All right. Um, particularly with respect to the picture of Brendan Dassey in, I think, Exhibit 204 it is?

MR. FALLON: All right. Um, is that a -- a fair depiction of his, um, physical appearance and attributes at or around the time of this, um, interview on November 6?

MR. FALLON: Uh, in other words, he appears to be a little heavier in that photograph than he does --

MR. EDELSTEIN: Your Honor --

MR. FALLON: (By Attorney Fallon) -- today?

MR. EDELSTEIN: -- object to the leading nature.

THE COURT: Uh, overruled.

MR. FALLON: (By Attorney Fallon) All right. Do you recognize the location of that picture?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: I believe so.

MR. FALLON: And what is it?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: It's the Avery cabin located in the town of Stephenson, I believe. I was in there once, and, uh, the table and the, uh, furnishings look familiar.

MR. FALLON: All right. Um, one last question. Uh, Counsel asked you, uh, in response to my questions about assessing Mr. Dassey's demeanor, does the playing of the audiotape assist in recollecting his demeanor during the course of the interview?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Uh, definitely.

MR. FALLON: No further questions. Would offer the exhibit.

THE COURT: Any objection to the exhibit?

MR. EDELSTEIN: No, that's fine, Your Honor.

THE COURT: All right. The exhibit is received. I think that's, uh, two thou -- 204?

COURT CLERK: Yep.

MR. FALLON: May we publish the exhibit, then, on the ELMO?

MR. FALLON: Thank you.

THE COURT: Any recross?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Just very briefly.

RecrossRecrossAnthony O'Neill — Recross Anthony O'Neill Raymond L. Edelstein

RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY EDELSTEIN:

MR. EDELSTEIN: Uh, Detective, um, while they get that up on the screen so the jury can see that picture, um, where did that picture come from? Do you know?

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I do not.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: No, I do not.

MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Um, Mr. Fallon asked you if that fairly depicted the condition, demeanor of the defendant, but he's sitting at the kitchen -- I'm sorry. The -- the physical attributes. Um, when you talked to him, um, you didn't get any information from him about height, weight, anything like that, did you?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Um, other than that hour and twenty-minute contact, that was really -- that's -- that's really the extent of your total contact with him throughout your participation in this investigation; right?

MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. That's all.

MR. EDELSTEIN: Your Honor, we would move, uh, 202 and 203.

THE COURT: Any objection to receiving the Exhibit Nos. 202 and 203?

MR. FALLON: We would move for their admission.

THE COURT: Well, it's -- it's already been offered by the defense.

THE COURT: I'm asking if you have any objection.

MR. FALLON: I'm sorry. I thought --

THE COURT: All right.

MR. FALLON: Obviously, we don't.

THE COURT: All right. They're received. You may step down.

ANTHONY O'NEILL: Thank you, Your Honor.

MR. FALLON: It's, um -- I think it's too late to start our next witness. He'll be a lengthy witness.

THE COURT: Can't we start it and at least get some testimony now?

MR. FALLON: We -- We can, if you wish.

THE COURT: Let's do it.

MR. FALLON: State would call, uh, Investigator Wiegert.

THE COURT: I think, before he testifies and is sworn in, there's a -- another trial stipulation that is to be, uh, published; is that correct?

MR. FALLON: I believe that's -- that's true.

THE COURT: All right. Ladies and gentlemen, I reminded you before that trial stipulations were evidence and should be treated as such. This trial stipulation reads as follows:

Number one. On October 31, 2005, Angela Schuster was the manager for AutoTrader Magazine with headquarters in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

On the same date, Dawn Pliszka performed duties as receptionist for AutoTrader.

Number two. That if called to testify, Angela Schuster would testify that Teresa Halbach was hired as a photographer for AutoTrader in October, 2004, and continued in that employment through October 31, 2005.

Schuster would further state that Teresa Halbach had performed photo shoots at the Avery salvage business on five occasions prior to October 31 in 2005, including June 20, October 22, October -- or, excuse me. Let me start again. June 20, August 22, August 29, September 19 and October 10.

: Number three. That if called to testify, Dawn Pliszka would testify that on October 31, 2005 she received a phone call from Steven Avery at approximately 8:12 a.m., at which time Avery requested that, quote, the same girl that had been out here before, end quote, come to his property to take photos of a van he had for sale.

Pliszka would further state that Avery made the appointment under the name, quote, B. Janda, end quote, and that Pliszka left a voicemail for Teresa Halbach at 9:46 a.m. asking if she could make the appointment.

Number four. That if called to testify, Dawn Pliszka would further testify that at 2:27 p.m. she did speak with Teresa Halbach on Teresa's cell phone at which time Ms. Halbach indicated that she was, quote, on her way, end quote, to the Avery property from her previous appointment.

That is the entirety of that stipulation. It will be marked as Exhibit 205?

COURT CLERK: Yes.

(Exhibit 205 marked for identification.)

THE COURT: Uh, first to the State, is this your stipulation?

THE COURT: To the defense, is this your stipulation?

MR. FREMGEN: That's correct.

THE COURT: All right. It's received. All right.

Continue to next page6.Mark Wiegert — Direct (Part 1)