1.Mark Wiegert — Cross/Redirect/Recross (Part 4)
706 linesTHE COURT: Morning, ladies and gentlemen, morning counsel. This is, for the record, State vs. Dassey, 06 CF 88. Appearances.
MR. FALLON: Morning, Your Honor. If it please the Court, the State continues in its appearance by Special Prosecutors Ken Kratz, Tom Fallon and Norm Gahn.
MR. FREMGEN: Attorney Mark Fremgen, Attorney Ray Edelstein appear with the defendant in person.
THE COURT: I believe, uh, we were crossing -- or -- or, uh, Mr. Edelstein was cross-examining Investigator Wiegert.
COURT CLERK: You want him to be sworn?
THE COURT: Uh, we'll re-swear him, yeah.
MARK WIEGERT, called as a witness herein, having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
COURT CLERK: Please be seated.
THE COURT: All right. Proceed.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Thank you, Your Honor.
CROSS-EXAMINATION CONT'D BY ATTORNEY EDELSTEIN:
MR. EDELSTEIN: Morning, Detective.
MARK WIEGERT: Morning.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You have before you up there by the witness stand a copy of the 3/1 transcript previously marked, and you'll have to help me out, what sticker number is on that?
MARK WIEGERT: Uh, 216.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Very good. And that's the one that, uh, you've previously identified; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Directing your attention to page 572, please, just generally, Detective Wiegert, can you tell this jury how many times during the course of this some three-hour exchange between you and Fassbender and the defendant did one or the other of you, not speaking of Brendan, of course, suggest to him an answer? Do you know?
I don't know that you need to look at the transcripts to answer that one. How many times during the course of the exchange did you or Fassbender suggest an answer to Brendan?
MARK WIEGERT: From this page?
MR. EDELSTEIN: No. During the three-hour interview.
MARK WIEGERT: I don't know. I couldn't answer that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you agree that it was certainly more than 20?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I wouldn't agree with that unless I counted them up. I have no idea.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So you haven't -- When's the last time you actually read through that?
MARK WIEGERT: Um, probably three days ago.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, take a look, if you would, at page 572, fourth line down, you tell him, do you not, come on, be honest, you went in that back room. You told him that; didn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, I did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. He didn't -- Or the next entry is, tell us now, Brendan. Correct? And that's by Fassbender?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you followed up before he has any opportunity to say anything, we know you were back there. Correct?
MARK WIEGERT: That's part of that superior knowledge which we talked about yesterday.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, is it superior knowledge or is it a flat out lie? Because we've talked about different techniques, lies being one and superior knowledge being another? Correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Truth of the matter is, when you talked to him on the lst, you had, quote, no superior knowledge from a factual standpoint that he was ever even back there; true or false?
MARK WIEGERT: Part of Mr. -- That's true. It's --
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right.
MARK WIEGERT: -- telling Mr. Dassey -- or getting Mr. Dassey to think that we had superior knowledge like we talked about.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. But it's a false statement to him; isn't it?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Let's talk about that, because you apparently -- you're obviously wanting him to say, yes, I was back there. Correct?
MARK WIEGERT: No. I'd like him to tell us the truth whether he was back there or not.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, within the -- the short frame of three lines, both you and Fassbender tell him that you believe he was back there. Correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. During the course of this investigation -- and you're the -- one of the two lead investigators -- was the carpet from the back bedroom ever removed?
MARK WIEGERT: I know a portion of it was. I don't know if it all was or not, but there was a portion of that carpet removed, yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, you're the lead investigator. It seems to me you would know what evidence has been submitted to your lab for analysis, wouldn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: I have a general knowledge of what went to the Crime Lab, yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And what was the purpose of submitting that carpet to the Crime Lab?
MARK WIEGERT: Again, I don't know for sure if that carpet went to the Crime Lab or just one of our techs looked at it. I --
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right.
MARK WIEGERT: -- I couldn't ans --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Let me ask you this: Given the questioning regarding the location of items in that back bedroom, would it have made any sense at all to you, as an investigator, to have taken the carpet to have it looked at to determine any sort of wear patterns that might be evident?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't think wear patterns would have told us anything.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Pard me?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't think wear patterns would have told us anything.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, you've got carpet in your house, I guess, somewhere, don't you?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Carpet under a piece of furniture tends not to get worn out, whereas, areas immediately surrounding that type of furniture tends to show some sign of wear, doesn't it?
MARK WIEGERT: That would be true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. So wouldn't it have made sense in your opinion as an investigator to pull that to determine -- in order to try to verify some of the things that Brendan said about the location of the furniture? Wouldn't that have made sense to you?
MARK WIEGERT: No, that wouldn't have made sense. Mr. Avery only was in that trailer for maybe a year. It wouldn't have made a difference.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Well, again, as to the back bedroom, on March 1 Brendan told you, did he not, that he cut Teresa's throat?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Yet there was absolutely no evidence of blood spatter or blood pooling in the bedroom; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: You're talking about two different things. But there was no blood spatter and we didn't find any pooling, which I'm not surprised about at all.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, in the bedroom, was it a -- a mattress only? Was there a box spring?
MARK WIEGERT: I believe there was a mattress and box spring.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Did you personally examine the mattress?
MARK WIEGERT: I did not. Our evidence techs do that work.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you discovered from the evidence techs that there was absolutely no evidence of blood on that mattress; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Not surprisingly. He's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Was there any luminol sprayed in the back bedroom?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Nothing to indicate the presence of blood in the back bedroom; true?
MARK WIEGERT: Not true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Was there any on the bed? The bedding?
MARK WIEGERT: The bedding was burned. There would be no way to tell.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, how do you know the bedding was burned?
MARK WIEGERT: Brendan Dassey told us the bedding was burned in the fire after they killed Teresa.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And Brendan Dassey also told you that he cut Teresa's hair, didn't he?
MARK WIEGERT: Yep.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But the truth of the matter is throughout the course of this investigation you didn't find one single hair fiber that could be identified to Teresa Halbach; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. So he told you that, but you -- What? You don't believe it or you do believe it?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I believe he cut their -- her hair.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. This was a carpet cleaner; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That is true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You guys seized the vacuum, didn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: We did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You had somebody go through that vacuum to determine the presence of things like hair, didn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, we did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you found none; true?
MARK WIEGERT: Not true. We found lot of hair.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you find any you could identify as Teresa's?
MARK WIEGERT: Doesn't work that way.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you find any you could identify as Teresa's?
MARK WIEGERT: No. But I'd like to explain if you'd like me to.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I'll give you a chance.
MARK WIEGERT: sure.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you have, during the course of your opportunity to be involved in this case, the opportunity to get from Teresa's residence any hairbrushes?
MARK WIEGERT: We did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So you had samples of her hair; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But none of what you found in the -- at the trailer was able to be matched up to any that came from any of her hairbrushes; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Again, not true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, is there -- did the lab provide you any sort of report indicating there was a match between the hair of what was found at the scene and what you believed to be Teresa's hair?
MARK WIEGERT: There was no hair attempted to match up. And there's reasons for that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, I'm sure the State will give you a chance to explain that. But I find it somewhat curious when you tell us that you believe some things but you don't necessarily believe the others that he told you?
MR. FALLON: Objection. Argumentative.
THE COURT: Objection's sustained.
MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Detective, how many times during the course of this three-hour exchange did you or Fassbender tell Brendan, um, in an effort to have him tell you things, it's not your fault, Steve made you do it?
MARK WIEGERT: Quite a few times as you guys saw yesterday.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Pard me?
MARK WIEGERT: Quite a few times as the jury saw yesterday.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you don't know how many?
MARK WIEGERT: Didn't count them. No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Directing your attention to page 580, please?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Toward the bottom, there, Detective, third entry -- ac -- actually fourth entry from the bottom, you stated to him, you helped to tie her up, though, didn't you, Brendan, because he couldn't tie her up alone. There's no way. Did you help him to tie her up? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's what I said. Yep.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Do you believe that that's a leading and suggestive question to him?
MARK WIEGERT: I believe that's something that makes sense.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you believe it to be a leading and suggestive question?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Going over to the next page -- Well, before we get there, during the course of this interview, Brendan told you that, um, there was a rope involved in the restraint; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And you were present during the course of all the prior testimony, and you heard, and I can't recall his name real quickly, but the truth of the matter is there was absolutely no rope fibers that were recovered that would indi -- that would tend to verify what he told you about the restraint?
MARK WIEGERT: I believe that's correct. There were no fibers found.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And there was no rope?
MARK WIEGERT: There was a lot of rope found on that, uh -- in that area.
MR. EDELSTEIN: In the bedroom?
MARK WIEGERT: Um, there was a lot of rope throughout. I don't know if there was any in the bedroom, specifically. There's a lot in the garage.
MR. EDELSTEIN: There wasn't any in the -- You have no memory of any being found in the --
MARK WIEGERT: I don't recall if there was specifically any in the bedroom or not.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, given what he told you about that, I would -- would you expect that you would remember that? That being a fairly significant, uh, piece of physical evidence to corroborate something he's told you?
MARK WIEGERT: We took almost a thousand pieces of evidence. No. I don't recall if there was or not.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He also told you that he helped in some fashion removing, um, the metal restraints that he claimed were used; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Detective, we've got a number of metal handcuffs; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, we do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: They all have different exhibit numbers?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. EDELSTEIN: The pink ones didn't have -- they didn't come from Steve Avery's place; right?
MARK WIEGERT: No. They came from Brendan Dassey's house.
MR. EDELSTEIN: They came out of his mother's room?
MARK WIEGERT: They came from where Brendan Dassey --
MR. EDELSTEIN: They --
MARK WIEGERT: -- lives.
MR. EDELSTEIN: -- didn't come from -- Brendan lives with his mother?
MARK WIEGERT: That is correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Who else lives with his mother?
MARK WIEGERT: Uh, he's got three other brothers.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Who?
MARK WIEGERT: Bobby, Blaine and Bryan, is it, I believe, and Barb.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. So why didn't you just tell us that they came from Bobby's house?
MARK WIEGERT: They came from the Dassey residence.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. But they didn't come from Brendan's room?
MARK WIEGERT: In his room, specifically, no.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. In any event, some other ones -- And I'm not attempting to befuddle you or the record, but I don't recall which exhibit number it was. There were -- there was a pair of handcuffs and these longer ones taken from the Avery place; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Brendan claims to have un -- undone some of these; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you know from your involvement in this case there's no fingerprints of his, no DNA of his on there; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Not surprisingly, no.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Not surprisingly?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You can editorialize when they ask you. Just try to answer mine for me, would you please?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure. I'll do the best I can.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Isn't it fair to say that you and Fassbender repeatedly, throughout the course of this in -- this interview, tried to get Brendan to say that Teresa had socks on while she was restrained on the bed?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't think that's true. I don't recall that. It might have been mentioned, but I don't think repeatedly that I'm aware of.
MR. EDELSTEIN: On the lst, if you know, how many times did either you or Fassbender tell Brendan, all right, Brendan, we're just going to start all over again? And you, essentially, would have him start from, what you believed to be the beginning, about when he got home from school?
MARK WIEGERT: I could estimate maybe three to four times, but, again, I didn't count how many times I said certain things.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So if it was more in the nature of six or seven, you wouldn't debate that, necessarily?
MARK WIEGERT: I wouldn't debate it with you unless I counted.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I believe you testified yesterday about some of the questions that you may have used to test the veracity or correctness of some of the things Brendan said; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And you gave as an example of the statement -- Directing your attention, Officer, to page 662?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: At the very bottom, that's the exchange that was had between the investigators and Brendan about the tattoo; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you used that as an example to the jury yesterday that that served as verification to you that he was being honest; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That was one of the things that we use. It's one of the false things that we know is false that we put to him.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. On 662, can you read the last entry?
MARK WIEGERT: Okay. We know now that Teresa had a tattoo on her stomach. Do you remember that?
MR. EDELSTEIN: And on 663, his response?
MARK WIEGERT: He shakes his head, no. Ugh-ugh.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. So by that he's indicating that he doesn't know whether Teresa had a tattoo on her stomach; right?
MARK WIEGERT: I guess that'd be up to interpretation. That's not how I took it.
MR. EDELSTEIN: That's not how you took it?
MARK WIEGERT: He -- Let me just re-read that real quick. Yeah, I guess you'd be accurate that he doesn't remember that. Um-hmm.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, and then Fassbender follows up on 663, do you disagree with me when I say that? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Right.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Brendan's response is, no, but I don't know where it -- where it was. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Exactly what he says.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay.
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So when he's asked, do you disagree with me, he says, no. Correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Which would suggest, certainly by his response, that he's not taking issue with what claim is being presented to him? I.e., Teresa had a tattoo. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Are you asking for my interpretation of what he said?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, isn't that what it meant to you?
MARK WIEGERT: It meant -- If you're asking what it meant to me, I'll tell you that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, let me ask you this: You asked these questions to get answers for purposes of trying to determine the truth and veracity of what he's saying?
MARK WIEGERT: That is true. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. When you asked these questions, you have to sit there and decide what does his answer mean in order to go onto the next question; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That is correct. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Am I correct in stating that he did not disagree with the assertion that was being put forth to him?
MARK WIEGERT: He's saying he doesn't disagree but he doesn't see a tattoo. That's exactly the correct --
MR. EDELSTEIN: That's right.
MARK WIEGERT: thing. Yeah.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So he is agreeing with the assertion, is he not?
MARK WIEGERT: He's saying he doesn't disagree, but he doesn't see a tattoo is what he's saying.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Wouldn't that suggest to you that he is, therefore, adopting and agreeing with the assertion?
MARK WIEGERT: No. If he was adopting it, he would have said, yeah, I remember the tattoo.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He told you he had no idea where it was; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Does that not suggest to you that he is adopting it? That I believe there was one, I just don't know where it was?
MARK WIEGERT: No, he doesn't say that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. But you have to interpret what he says, as an investigator, do you not?
MARK WIEGERT: I do exactly what you're doing, yes. We try to interpret.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. And that's what any human does when they speak with somebody? They have to interpret and understand answers, don't they?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: How many times did he change his answer after either you or Fassbender expressed displeasure by telling him things? For example, Brendan, come on. Or, Brendan, you're lying. Or, Brendan, we know that's not true. How many times did he change during the course of that three-hour --
MR. FALLON: Objection. Irrelevance as phrased.
THE COURT: Sustained.
MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Did he ever change his answer to any question that you asked of him, or Fassbender asked of him, when you exples -- expressed displeasure?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Happened how many -- Do -- do you know how many times?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you disagree with me that if I suggested it was more than 20?
MARK WIEGERT: I can't agree or disagree unless I count.
MR. EDELSTEIN: During the course of that interview, Brendan told you that Teresa had been stabbed inside the back of the Rav 4; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yeah, I believe that's correct. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Yet other than the evidence that's already been testified to regarding, uh, blood smears along the back or where the expert believed the hair may have been, that you would concede that there certainly wasn't any evidence of blood spatter; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: I wouldn't expect evidence of blood spatter.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you explec -- expect blood spatter with a stab wound?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: It would -- But you're not an expert on blood spatter, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: Not an expert, no.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. During the course of that interview, Brendan told you that Teresa was moved about using what's been described as a creeper; true?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you know that, as a result of that statement, the creeper was forensically examined; true?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: No blood?
MARK WIEGERT: Not surprising, no.
MR. EDELSTEIN: No DNA?
MARK WIEGERT: Again, no.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So do you believe him when he says that?
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you have no physical evidence to back it up; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Not true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Tell me what you have by way of the creeper?
MARK WIEGERT: We have the creeper, which he said was in the garage.
MR. EDELSTEIN: How many times had that boy been in the garage before March 31?
MARK WIEGERT: You'd have to ask him that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you ask him that?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Don't you think he was familiar with what was in that garage?
MARK WIEGERT: I don't know.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You didn't ask him, did you?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I didn't.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did it seem reasonable, given your experience as a human being, an investigator, that this young man may have been in that garage before March 1?
MARK WIEGERT: He may have been. I don't know.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm going to hand you what's been marked as Exhibit 129. That's the, uh, .22 taken from Avery's bedroom; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. EDELSTEIN: In connection with your occupation, I assume you've had some firearms training?
MARK WIEGERT: I've had some. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you hunt?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. But you do know the difference between a single shot rifle and an automatic or semi-automatic; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Certainly.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Do you know the difference between a bolt-action rifle, and a single shot, or an automatic?
MARK WIEGERT: I do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you know the difference between a lever-action rifle, and a single shot, and a bolt-action, and a semi-automatic?
MARK WIEGERT: I do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And what you're holding is what type?
MARK WIEGERT: This would be -- I believe that they described it as a semi-automatic.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Very good. Um, now -- And it's -- So it's not a single shot; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. If you would -- I think it's on 650. On the lst, when you had this interview -- And it's about three-quarters of the way down. Bren -- Brendan had previously been asked, um, what type of gun it was; right? And he had -- he responded that it was a single; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And then immediately thereafter Fassbender says, it was a single shot, not a semi-automatic? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Now, I realize that you didn't ask that particular question -- And answer it if you can. But do you know why semi-automatic was contained in that question, when, in fact, that you knew it was a semi-automatic that had been recovered, as opposed to the question being presented to him about a bolt- or a lever-action?
MARK WIEGERT: I didn't ask the question.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So you don't know the answer?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't know why he said it that way?
MARK WIEGERT: You'd have to ask him.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Is it fair to say that there really wasn't any sort of follow-up to determine why he believed it was a single shot as opposed to the semi-automatic, which, in fact, we know was true?
MARK WIEGERT: Why there was a difference in his answer was your question?
MR. EDELSTEIN: My question is, can you explain to me why there was no follow-up on that issue in order to try to, in fact, get a correct answer because he was obviously wrong?
MARK WIEGERT: We don't try to get correct answers. We try to get the truth.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, going into this interview, you were well-aware of the forensic findings regarding the skull pieces and the, uh, gunshot wound entrances; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Um, I was aware of them. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. If you know, how many times was it suggested or said to Brendan that he shot Teresa?
MARK WIEGERT: Several times. And, again, it's one of those things he resisted each time we asked him. He resisted.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. So on some occasions he said, no, you're wrong, I didn't do that?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Despite the fact that he -- yourself and Fassbender repeatedly, uh, made statements suggesting that you knew that he had shot her; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yep. That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you didn't have anything at all to support that sort of conclusion, did you?
MARK WIEGERT: Conclusion being --
MR. EDELSTEIN: That Brendan had shot Teresa?
MARK WIEGERT: No. We asked him the question.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you ask him the question or -- You -- You agreed with me just a minute ago that statements were made to him, which the statements, in and of themselves, suggest that, yes, he actually shot Teresa; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes. We asked him several times.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Yet you had absolutely nothing to support a belief that he had, in fact, done that?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, we asked him several times whether or not he shot her. Again, he resisted each and every time.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You suggested to him that his DNA would be on the gun; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, we did. In which he said there --
MR. EDELSTEIN: If you had nothing at all to support even a conclusion or a guess, even a guess, that he may have shot Teresa, why would you present him with those type of questions?
MARK WIEGERT: I didn't know whether or not he shot Teresa or not at that time. He puts himself in the bedroom. He puts himself in the garage where she was killed.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You expressed an opinion to him, certainly, that he did, in fact, do it, did he -- did you not?
MARK WIEGERT: I certainly did, yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Isn't it true, Detective, that the first person, during the course of this exchange with Brendan on the lst, who even mentioned her being shot in the head, was you?
MARK WIEGERT: That is true. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. And, initially, he said, yes, he believed there were two shots in the head; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Which fits with the evidence that we have. Two shots in the head, that's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. All right. So if that fits with the evidence that you have, I guess you would believe what he tells -- what he said was correct then; right?
MARK WIEGERT: I believe that there were two shots in the head, yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't --
MARK WIEGERT: That we know of. I mean, we don't have the whole skull, unfortunately. Could there have been more? Certainly.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Sure. The fact of the matter is that after you go back and forth with this, he changes it several times, doesn't he, as far as the number?
MARK WIEGERT: When we get to the torso and things, yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. I think the number runs all the way up to 10 or 11?
MARK WIEGERT: That is true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Exhibit 128. It's a little box. It's got the -- the shells casings -- .22 shell casings, CCI manufacturer, from the garage; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You're the lead investigator; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes. One of the --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. You never asked anybody at the lab to examine these for DNA evidence; true or false?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true. Lot of reasons for it.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You'll get your chance.
MARK WIEGERT: I'm sure I will.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You never asked anybody at the lab to examine them for fingerprint evidence?
MARK WIEGERT: Pretty difficult to get fingerprint evidence off of that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You're not a fingerprint expert, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: I didn't say I was. No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: These -- These are pretty smooth surfaces, aren't they?
MARK WIEGERT: Pretty small smooth surfaces.
MR. EDELSTEIN: In order to load this gun, somebody has to touch those shells at some point, don't they?
MARK WIEGERT: Probably not big enough to get a whole fingerprint on.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You're not a fingerprint expert, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You've seen -- you have been involved in cases, have you not, where experts have testified and you relied on evidence utilizing portions of fingerprints; correct?
MR. FALLON: Your Honor, I'm going object to the continued line of inquiry of the, uh, investigator. Said he wasn't a fingerprint analyst.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He's offering opinions about --
THE COURT: I -- I'll overrule the objection.
MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) You know what a partial print is, don't you?
MARK WIEGERT: I do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And do you know investigators oftentimes rely on that; right?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't know that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Um, directing your attention to page 582, please?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm sorry, 587?
MARK WIEGERT: Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. That's -- Is -- is that fair to say that that's about the time during the course of this interview that the issue comes up as far as Teresa's head? It hadn't really come up much before that? Fair statement?
MARK WIEGERT: It comes up here.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Um, and Fassbender states about halfway down, it's extremely, extremely important you tell us this for us to believe you. Do you see that?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And immediately thereafter you say, come on Brendan, what else? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Very true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Um, flip over, if you would, to 589?
MARK WIEGERT: Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Six lines down, when he's asked how many times Steve shot Teresa, what's his answer?
MARK WIEGERT: He says, twice, but I don't know if he's referring to the head or what, but he does say twice.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, you didn't ask him what was being referred to, did you?
MARK WIEGERT: Well, he's just talked about the head prior to that. So you asked me before to interpret and that would be my interpretation, but...
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, Detective, I hate to quibble, but I don't think it takes a lot of interpretation. Look at the very first question on that page. You asked him, where did you shoot her? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Where did you shoot her? Right.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Yes.
Answer: In the head.
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Who shot her? What did he say?
MARK WIEGERT: He did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Talking about Steve; right? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: I would assume. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, who else were you looking at?
MARK WIEGERT: He said, he did. Yes, I assume he's talking about Steve.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Um,- little further down is it indicated anywhere else upon the person of Teresa where she may have been shot?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes. He's asked, do you shoot her elsewhere?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, when you use the term "you" there's no way to know from this transcript or, quite frankly, from the video, who you're talking about? Are you talking about he and Steve collectively? Are you talking about him individually? Would you agree with me that there's no way to discern to whom you reference that question?
MARK WIEGERT: Fassbender asked, do you shoot her elsewhere? His answer: In the stomach.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Fassbender then asks a little further down, how many times do you shoot her when he handed you the gun? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yep.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You have nothing to support that suggestion, do you?
MARK WIEGERT: We certainly did. And the answer is zero. Which he continues to resist that. You're correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, when you say "resist" are you saying that he is lying?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I didn't say that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But do you agree that prior to that question being asked, you hadn't absolutely nothing to suggest that there was any truth to this statement that, when he handed you the gun?
MARK WIEGERT: Not sure I understand your question.
MR. EDELSTEIN: When you did the interview on the lst --
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: -- you had nothing to support the statement submitted to Brendan when he, making reference to Steve, handed you the gun. Is that true or false?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. But, nevertheless, that was presented to him as if it were a fact; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely it was.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. If you would flip over to page 591?
MARK WIEGERT: Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: The last entry on the page, Detective, would you read that question?
MARK WIEGERT: How many times did you shoot her? Tell me again how many times did you shoot her?
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you asked that question; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And the answer?
MARK WIEGERT: He says, three. Which is not surprising.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And your next question on 592?
MARK WIEGERT: And where -- where did he shoot her?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Talking again about Steve; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. His answer: In the head, stomach, and heart.
MARK WIEGERT: That's exactly what he said.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You then asked him, what side of the head; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yep.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And he told you he had no idea. What he said was, no.
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. How, if at all, do you account for -- Well, just let me put it this way: So when this questioning continues about where the shots may have occurred, it changes, does it not?
MARK WIEGERT: It does.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you knew that, from the forensics, there were two pieces of skull, two holes; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. And I have to find my right page here. During the course of this exchange, you had asked about some hooks or wires in the garage; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Um, were those ever forensically examined?
MARK WIEGERT: Um, they were looked at by our evidence techs.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And they found absolutely nothing of any significance; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: If you know, how many times during the course of the contact you had with Brendan on the lst did you personally ask him, or suggest to him, or tell him that Steve made him do something?
MARK WIEGERT: I can't -- Excuse me. I didn't go through and count how many times I made any statement. I don't know.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you agree that it was multiple?
MARK WIEGERT: I'll agree it was more than one time.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Would you agree it's more than ten?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I wouldn't agree with that unless I counted it.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. If you would, go to page 571, please?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure. Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: About in the middle of the page, little -- little past that, and this is when you're talking about whether or not Brendan engaged in any sort of sexual activity with Teresa. Is that a fair statement?
MARK WIEGERT: Yeah, it looks like it. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. You make the statement to him, and this is a little past halfway down, okay, what happens next? Remember, we already know, but we need to hear it from you. You see that?
MARK WIEGERT: I do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And that's what you told him; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That's true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And in literally the same breath you said, it's not your fault. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: You are right. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: How many times did you tell him things like, it's not your fault?
MARK WIEGERT: Quite a few. I haven't counted them, but...
MR. EDELSTEIN: How about --
MARK WIEGERT: Many.
MR. EDELSTEIN: -- page -- Go to page 574, please. Again, about halfway down?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You said to him, it's not your fault. He makes you do it. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And I take it you don't believe, as a trained investigator, dealing with Brendan Dassey, that phrasing things to him that way, where you suggest that if he did something, it's not his fault, is going to cause him to say he did, because you are telling him that it's okay and it's not his fault?
MARK WIEGERT: No. I don't believe that at all.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right.
MARK WIEGERT: Clearly you saw on the tape what he said.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Everybody saw what he says.
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you would have to give me this, Detective, that it's not just the sterile words that people speak, but it's the meaning behind them; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: It's the intonation; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: It's the reaction between individuals; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely.
MR. EDELSTEIN: How many times during the course of this contact did you praise him?
MARK WIEGERT: Again, I haven't counted anything I've said in the interview. I don't know how many times I said anything in that interview.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Is it fair to say that it occurred on multiple occasions? It occurred more than once?
MARK WIEGERT: I'll agree with you.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But you don't know how many times?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Um, if you would, go to page 595?
MARK WIEGERT: Five ninety-five?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Yes.
MARK WIEGERT: Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You see about three quarters of the way down? The statement is made to him -- this is by Fassbender -- I think you're doing a real good job up to this point. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yep.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And he goes on to say some other things; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: Yeah, it's a pretty lengthy paragraph.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. A little further down, he -- when we're talking about the garage, he claims to have knowledge about some things happening in the garage; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And he prefaces his request for Brendan to tell the truth by the following words: You need to tell us about this so we know you're telling the truth. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And in fairness, he said, I'm not going to tell you what to say. You need to tell us. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: You're correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you knew that this was being recorded, didn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely. So did he.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So if you wanted to get something on this video, you knew all you had to do was say it; right?
MARK WIEGERT: It's nothing to do with the video.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you -- you knew it's being recorded?
MARK WIEGERT: So did Brendan.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. I'll grant you that. Think you're a little more sophisticated and intelligent than Brendan?
MARK WIEGERT: I would hope so.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you think so? Not what you hope.
MARK WIEGERT: I think so. Yeah, I think so.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So is Fassbender; isn't he?
MARK WIEGERT: I think so.
MR. EDELSTEIN: In fact, he's been at this lot long -- about twice as long as you have, hasn't he?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Just as the number of gunshots that you discussed with Brendan changed throughout the course of this contact, is it -- it is correct, is it not, that the times changed when talking about events, particularly when he gets home, when he goes over by Steve; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes. Not surprisingly, they do.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Isn't it true, Detective, during the course of your contact on the ist, that Brendan's told you flat out he was guessing at some of the questions that were asked of him?
MARK WIEGERT: You'd have to be more specific. I don't know. I'm sure he may have said that once or twice, but...
MR. EDELSTEIN: For example, the knife. If you to page 645?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure. Okay.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You asked him, now, quarter of the way down, what about the knife? Where is the knife? Be honest with me. Where's the knife? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. His answer: Probably in the drawer.
MARK WIEGERT: That's what he says.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And you asked, which drawer? Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Right.
MR. EDELSTEIN: If you would, just kind of read yourself the rest of that on that page.
MR. FALLON: I'm sorry, Counsel, what page was that again?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Five -- I'm sorry. Six forty-five.
MR. FALLON: Thank you.
MARK WIEGERT: Yeah. I'm ready.
MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Is it fair to say that even you concluded that he has no idea what happened to this knife?
MARK WIEGERT: That -- That's true, because he says, I think it is. Indicating he's really not sure where it went.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So the insertion of the simple word "think" indicates to you that that, in and of itself, is not a complete affirmation of what's being said? Do I understand you correctly?
MARK WIEGERT: I'm saying is that he says, I think -- that's where I think it is. And I take that to mean he's not really sure where it might be.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So when he told you, for example, that he thought it was two shots, three shots, ten shots, are you -- are you then adopting the same interpretation that you're not even certain that he has any certainty to that -- that answer?
MARK WIEGERT: I'm thinking he knows she was shot, but he probably doesn't recall the exact number of times. That's the way I took it. Which is not surprising.
MR. EDELSTEIN: When Brendan said things that you did not believe to be true, is it fair to say that you attempted him to correct his response?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, and several times he would resist that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, when you say "resist", you're certainly not telling this jury that the mere fact that he did not change an answer, that you have any independent method to prove that his answer was false?
MARK WIEGERT: It shows that he's not very suggestible to answers. That he answers what he knows. That's what it shows.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Now, you're not an ex -- an expert on suggestibility by any means, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: You are correct. I'm not.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. But you conceded earlier that he did change his answers many times?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, he did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: But when you say he resists -- Let -- Let's go back to the hair.
MARK WIEGERT: Um-hmm.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I guess you would conclude that he, uh -- he -- he clearly told you that he cut the hair; right?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You asked him where the hair went?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. Supposedly on what he described as the counter. Later determined to be the nightstand or something in Steve's room; right?
MARK WIEGERT: No. I believe what he said is on the dresser.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He told you a counter. You asked him. Then he clarified that it was the dresser; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: I recall him saying dresser. If he said counter first, I'll go along with that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Whatever. We're talking about the back bedroom?
MARK WIEGERT: That is correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He told you that; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You had nothing to sh -- You found no hairs of Teresa in the trailer; true or false?
MARK WIEGERT: We don't know. So I'd have to --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well --
MARK WIEGERT: say false.
MR. EDELSTEIN: what do you mean you don't know? You're the lead investigator. My question is this simple, did you find any hairs of Teresa Halbach in the trailer of Steven Avery?
MARK WIEGERT: We don't know.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You looked, didn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: We recovered a lot of hair.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, did you not ask anybody to check it to see whose it was?
MARK WIEGERT: It's not that simple.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You're not an expert on hair comparison, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: You're right, I'm not.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You had -- At any given time, what was the maximum number of people out there on the Avery property helping you with this case?
MARK WIEGERT: Any given time it could range from 15 to over a hundred.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And not only that, you have the resources of the State Crime Lab; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, we did.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You had troopers out there helping you?
MARK WIEGERT: Helping us search. That is correct.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You had volunteers?
MARK WIEGERT: We had volunteer firefighters helping us go through the salvage yard.
MR. EDELSTEIN: With all of these resources, there some reason that you did not -- Let me make sure I'm clear. Did you ever ask anybody involved in the forensic world to compare hairs found at Steven Avery's trailer with known samples from Teresa?
MARK WIEGERT: There were general discussions revolving --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you or didn't you? That's a simple question. Yes or no?
MARK WIEGERT: There were --
MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm just asking you the same way you asked Brendan many times. Yes or no?
MARK WIEGERT: There were general discussions. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Did you ask -- So is the answer, yes? Did you ask somebody to do a comparison?
MARK WIEGERT: We had general discussions about hair. Specific -- Did I ask somebody, specifically, to do a comparison? No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And you agree that you could have done that, couldn't you?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. You were lead investigator? Co-lead investigator; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. EDELSTEIN: What stopped you from asking either the Wisconsin State Crime Lab or another lab from doing a hair comparison?
MARK WIEGERT: Well, if you'd like me, I'll explain the whole thing about hair, if that's what you'd like.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I don't want to know your spin on the value of doing the comparisons. I just want to know why you didn't ask somebody to do it?
MR. FALLON: Well, then, he's -- then he's now entitled to answer that question.
THE COURT: I -- I think he is, Counsel. I think -- I think -- You -- you may characterize it, editorially, as a spin, but you've asked him, so go ahead and answer it.
MARK WIEGERT: Thank you.
MR. EDELSTEIN: (By Attorney Edelstein) Why didn't you do it?
MARK WIEGERT: Thank you. Hair evidence -- First of all, we took a carpet cleaner, which you've all seen. There's a vacuum cleaner that was taken as well. Okay? There is probably thousands and thousands and thousands of hairs both in there and in the vacuum cleaner. Number one. >
Number two, we had to prioritize things on this case. It was a huge case. One of the biggest submissions of evidence ever done to the Wisconsin State Crime Lab.
Had we had somebody look through every piece of hair that we found, they'd still be doing it today, and probably still be doing it two years from now. The Crime Lab is -- has only so many people, which you all know, which you've all seen.
We took the evidence that we thought best would solve this crime and bring the murderer of Teresa Halbach to justice, and that's what we did.
Could we have spent two, three, four years going through every hair? Absolutely. Is it feasible? It's not feasible.
And if he's going to talk to me about DNA, which he's probably going to, on hair, almost impossible unless you have a root. He never cut any of the -- He never pulled the hair out. He said he cut it. Thus, there's no root there.
So there's a lot of reasons we didn't do hair analysis. Not to mention the Crime Lab does very limited hair analysis anymore to begin with.
' DNA? Absolutely, if you have the root. Even if you have the root of that hair, and it went through that cleaner, you have to have skin follicles on that root. The odds of having skin follicles on the root of that hair when it goes through a cleaner like that are probably slim to none. Could we have done it in the next couple years? Certainly. That's the reason.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So as a matter of -- of prioritizing things?
MARK WIEGERT: One of the reasons.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Could have been done. You just chose not to; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: I'll go with you. Sure.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Okay. Detective, let me ask you this, uh, going back to the interview again. Initially, I believe, Brendan said that he saw Teresa up on the porch talking with Steve; right?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And then at some point in time he was confronted, um, and Fassbender -- and, I'm sorry, I can't find a page -- but if you have an independent memory -- Maybe do it this way. Um, Fassbender told him that, quote, you couldn't have seen Teresa on the porch. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Very true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And then Brendan agreed with that, and said, no, I didn't. Right?
MARK WIEGERT: Correct, because Brendan didn't see her there.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And that's another example of times that he changed based upon either a leading question or a negative response from one of you guys; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Because Brendan knew he was caught in a lie. Exactly.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, you don't know what Brendan knew, did you? You -- Come on.
MARK WIEGERT: Brendan knew it wasn't true. She wasn't there on the porch at that time. We know that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You have the ability to sit here and purport to tell this jury that you have the ability to know what he knows?
MARK WIEGERT: I know Teresa wasn't there on the porch at that time. So he couldn't have seen her.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You're not a mind reader, are you?
MARK WIEGERT: She wasn't on the porch.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Are you a mind reader? Do you have that ability?
MARK WIEGERT: I'm not a mind reader.
MR. EDELSTEIN: That's all.
THE COURT: Redirect?
MR. FALLON: Yes. Thank you.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY FALLON:
MR. FALLON: Let's start with, um, guns. Were any bolt-action or lever-action .22 caliber weapons seized from Steven Avery's trailer?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. FALLON: All right. During your questioning of the defendant, did it appear to you that he had sufficient -- Or no. Did it appear to you that he really knew much about guns?
MARK WIEGERT: No. Matter of fact, he had talked about being afraid to shoot a cat, or watch somebody shoot a cat, for fear he had hardly any knowledge of guns.
MR. FALLON: All right. Now, Counsel asked you -- I'm going to switch, now, to the SUV and this blood spatter question. You were asked a question on cross-examination about wouldn't you expect blood spatter in the SUV if a stabbing, for instance, had occurred there, and you said you would not. Tell us why?
MARK WIEGERT: That's correct. When somebody's stabbed, there isn't this great amount of blood that goes flying out of a stab wound. Anybody that's in the medical field has knowledge of that.
Um, when you talk about blood spatter, it usually comes from something higher velocity. Stabbing a knife into somebody isn't going to cause all this blood to go anywhere. When you stab somebody in the area, from my limited medical knowledge -- Where is it he says he stabbed her? It's in the cavity. Even, free bleeding. It's going to bleed into that cavity. It's pretty simple. There isn't going to be this big blood spatter. It's not going to happen.
MR. FALLON: All right. So there's a difference between spatter and pooling of blood, for instance?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. FALLON: All right. And just so that we're clear, we didn't see any pooling in the center of that cargo area upon forensic examination?
MARK WIEGERT: No, I wouldn't expect it to.
MR. FALLON: All right. Now, did you learn that there were the pos -- that -- that it was at least two gunshot wounds to the head at the same time? Did you learn about both gunshot findings at the same time?
MARK WIEGERT: No. Actually, um, we had learned about the first gunshot wound, I believe it was around November -- Correction. Let me -- Let me go back. I believe it was around, um, February 27. We learned much later than that, and I believe it was after this interview, about the second gunshot wound that they found. So, no, we did not know there were two suspected entrance wounds.
MR. FALLON: At least two?
MARK WIEGERT: Two that we know of. Again, we don't have all of the skull.
MR. FALLON: Okay. Um, I just have a couple of final questions. The defendant was at, um, the Sheriff's Department for quite a while. But in terms of the actual interview of the defendant, how much interview time are we talking about here?
MARK WIEGERT: Two hours and I believe it's 53 minutes, outside of breaks when we got him water, when we got him sodas, when we got him a sandwich, when we offered him to go to the bathroom. Outside of those breaks, there was about two hours -- just under three hours.
MR. FALLON: Of questioning?
MARK WIEGERT: Of questioning.
MR. FALLON: All right.
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. FALLON: Now, um, yesterday, uh, when we ended, Counsel asked you about the absence of DNA and fingerprints that connect the defendant to the crime. Do you recall that?
MARK WIEGERT: I do.
MR. FALLON: All right. Now, although there is no DNA profile of the defendant, or his fingerprints, is there scientific evidence that connects him to this crime in your opinion?
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely.
MR. FALLON: Let's take that in two parts. After receiving the statement that we witnessed yesterday, what did you do?
MARK WIEGERT: After receiving the statement, which you guys all saw yesterday, on March 1, we applied and obtained a search warrant, which was signed by a judge. We entered that garage, did a full search of that garage.
As you already know, we found two bullet fragments in that garage. Number one bullet fragment that came -- that we found underneath that air compressor, which you all saw, we retrieved, we sent it to the lab, and we found Teresa Halbach's DNA on that bullet that we discovered after Mr. Dassey told us she was shot in the garage.
That very bullet was analyzed by the weapons specialist, which you heard talk here. That bullet came from the .22 hanging in Steve Avery's bedroom, which Brendan told us. Brendan told us where we'd find that .22 and that's where we found it. To the exclusion of all other guns, that's where that bullet came from. That's information that Mr. Dassey told us during this interview that we did not know.
MR. FALLON: All right. And while you were interviewing him, did you have a -- a fair command of the forensic evidence that you knew and that existed prior to this statement?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, sir.
MR. FALLON: All right. And in terms of the evidence that was known to you at the time of the interview, what scientific evidence did you -- do you believe corroborates many of the details he provided? Just to --
MARK WIEGERT: There's a lot of it. I -- I'll -- I'll give you a few examples. The bleach, for example, corroborates what he says about cleaning up in the garage. We find the bleach bottle where he says we'd find the bleach bottle. The bleach bottle's empty.
The rake and the shovel, which he says they took out of the garage to help tend the fire. Where did we find the rake and shovel? Out by the fire.
His pants. He's the one who tells us that there's bleach stains on the pants from cleaning up blood in the garage. He turns over the pants. You saw for yourself what's on the pants.
He indicated that there were re -- restraints used. He's the one who told us they were handcuffs. We find handcuffs.
He tells us they put Teresa, after they kill her, in the back of her own vehicle. We find Teresa's DNA, blood, in the back of that vehicle.
He tells us that Steve's got a cut on his finger. We find Steve's blood in Teresa's truck. Just a few examples.
MR. FALLON: Thank you.
MR. FALLON: No further questions.
THE COURT: Uh, any recross on these --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Yes.
THE COURT: -- points?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Please, Your Honor. Briefly.
RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY EDELSTEIN:
MR. EDELSTEIN: So if Steven Avery had told Brendan Dassey, when Brendan got over there, I shot Teresa in the garage. You need to help me clean it up. That's just -- that's -- that's certainly a possibility, isn't it?
MARK WIEGERT: Are you saying that's all he told him?
MR. EDELSTEIN: No. I'm just asking you. You -- you said that in order to scientifically connect the defendant, you pointed to the bullet fragment with Teresa's DNA; right?
MARK WIEGERT: That is correct. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: I'm not going to argue with you. We know it has her DNA --
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: -- right? And that came from the gun; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't know how many times he was in that garage before he -- before the -- the, uh, 31st, do you?
MARK WIEGERT: How many times Brendan was in the garage?
MR. EDELSTEIN: Right.
MARK WIEGERT: No, I don't.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't know how many times he sat around watching Steve burn things in that pit, do you?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't know if he ever saw that rake and shovel that's been paraded around up here before the 3lst, do you?
MARK WIEGERT: No. He said he got them out of the garage.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So he could have had preexisting knowledge of the rake and the shovel; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Sure. He could have.
MR. EDELSTEIN: He could have had preexisting knowledge about that gun hanging up there in that bedroom, couldn't he?
MARK WIEGERT: I'm assuming he could have.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. This all occurred Nov -- October 31; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: And he said that he told you that he helped Steve clean up this mess; right? In the garage?
MARK WIEGERT: He said he helped do a lot of things. One of the things was help --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Listen --
MARK WIEGERT: -- clean up the garage. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. And he talked about using bleach; right?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: So the fact that there's a bleach bottle that is discovered some four months later in Steve's trailer, you're telling this jury is scientific evidence to corroborate what he said?
MARK WIEGERT: I'm telling you to put it all together, along with the gas cap --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Let them put it together.
MARK WIEGERT: Absolutely.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Do you -- you just answer my question?
MARK WIEGERT: Yes, I am.
MR. EDELSTEIN: That bleach bottle wasn't scientifically analyzed to determine whether it had Brendan's DNA on it, was it?
MARK WIEGERT: No.
MR. EDELSTEIN: It wasn't scientifically analyzed to determine whether it had his fingerprints on it, was it?
MARK WIEGERT: Wouldn't expect it to.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You don't know how long that thing had been sitting there, do you?
MARK WIEGERT: I don't.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You told Mr. Fallon you had a pretty fair command of the, uh, forensic evidence, uh, by the time you conducted the interview; right?
MARK WIEGERT: I knew the majority of it.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. Um, when, um, did you -- Well, let me ask you this way. Did -- did I understand you to say that it was February 27 was the first time that you had any knowledge about a gunshot wound being an issue in this case?
MARK WIEGERT: I can tell you that there was a report written by somebody at the Crime Lab on the 27th about a suspected gunshot wound, and we received it on the 28th. Um, there may have been conversations with, um, for example, Leslie Eisenberg, who you saw testify about the skull pieces, earlier than that. I didn't --
MR. EDELSTEIN: Excuse me. What -- what was that about earlier than the 27th from Eisenberg?
MARK WIEGERT: I said there may have been discussions that she may have found one piece of skull earlier than that.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Let me ask you this.
MARK WIEGERT: But I don't know.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Well, do you have a recollection of being told as early as November 15 of 105 from your lead co- investigator, Agent Fassbender, that he got information from Eisenberg that there was clear evidence of a gunshot wound?
MARK WIEGERT: Do I have an independent recollection of that? No. But I believe that would be true that --
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right.
MARK WIEGERT: I don't know that she could say it was a clear wound at that time. She had a sus -- suspect that there was one at that time.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Yeah.
MARK WIEGERT: That's probably true.
MR. EDELSTEIN: All right. So it certainly wasn't a revelation, uh, from Brendan that there was an issue of a gunshot wound; correct?
MARK WIEGERT: One gunshot wound.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You already knew this going into this interview?
MARK WIEGERT: One gunshot wound. Yes, I said that. Yes.
MR. EDELSTEIN: You also indicated in response to Counsel's question about corroborating what he said to you from a scientific standpoint that he told you Steven had a cut finger and you found some blood; right?
MARK WIEGERT: True.
MR. EDELSTEIN: If he was over there tending the fire and he saw Steve had a cut finger, does that surprise you?
MARK WIEGERT: He even said Steve went in and got a bandaid to put on it when he was --
MR. EDELSTEIN: So what? If he sees a cut finger and he says he got a bandaid, how is that scientific?
MARK WIEGERT: It's knowledge that he would have known and --
MR. EDELSTEIN: It's not --
MARK WIEGERT: -- puts him -- again puts him there.
MR. EDELSTEIN: Okay. That's all.