3.James Lenk — Cross/Redirect/Recross (Part 3)
1,153 lines(Jury in at 9:43 a.m.)
THE COURT: You may be seated. Mr. Strang you may, uh, resume your cross-examination.
MR. STRANG: Thank you, Your Honor. I, uh -- I will do that by marking, I think, Exhibit 214.
(Exhibit No. 214 marked for identification.)
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) Lieutenant Lenk, what is Exhibit 214?
JAMES LENK: It's a evidence transmittal form that goes to the State Crime Lab.
MR. STRANG: Whose writing is on it?
JAMES LENK: That is mine.
MR. STRANG: When did you prepare that evidence transmittal form?
JAMES LENK: September 19, 2002.
MR. STRANG: This relates to the 1985 case against Steven Avery?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: This is the, uh, evidence we were discussing just before, uh, the break that Mr. Kratz requested?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: All right. Now, uh, this is a form that you would have prepared, or you did prepare, to document, again, when a -- an item of evidence is moving from place A to place B; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And then if it comes back from place B to place A, you would document that as well?
JAMES LENK: If it came back to the evidence room, yes.
MR. STRANG: Correct. And this is part of something that you, as an evidence custodian, or former evidence custodian, know as maintaining the chain of custody?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: So, by chain, the -- the metaphor is that, uh, from the moment you see or gather evidence, every person who touches that evidence along the way is a link in the chain and you want to make sure that all the links are there?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: So that when the evidence comes to court, there's an unbroken chain, if you will. All the links are present, back to the time the evidence was seized?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: This document, Exhibit 214, is a document intended to establish one of those links, essentially?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Now, the items that were sent, uh, on or about September 19, 2002, to the State Crime Lab, uh, included hair and fingernail cuttings?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: It was one box of items containing those things; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: To be tested by use of DNA procedures according to a circuit court order; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You did not transmit a vial of blood to the State Crime Lab on September 19, 2002?
JAMES LENK: I didn't transmit anything.
MR. STRANG: You didn't cause to be transmitted or document the transmittal of a vial of blood on Exhibit 214?
JAMES LENK: No, I had no knowledge of a vial of blood.
MR. STRANG: That is, sir, as evidence custodian, did you go over to the Clerk of Court's Office to examine that 1985 court file and take from it the things that were to be sent to the State Crime Lab?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: You did not personally do that?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Although you were the evidence custodian of the Department?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: But these items were exhibits held by the court since the end of the trial?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Which is exactly what you wrote on Exhibit 214; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: So you were aware on September 19, 2002 that the court was holding exhibits in Mr. Avery's earlier case since the end of the trial?
JAMES LENK: I was aware of this exhibit, yes.
MR. STRANG: Actually, you used the plural as exhibits; correct? Presumably, you mean hair and fingernail cuttings?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: All right. When a, uh -- when a court pulls evidence after a trial, where is that held?
JAMES LENK: I don't know.
MR. STRANG: Suppose that's what the Clerk of Court does?
JAMES LENK: I would -- Yes, I would guess so.
MR. STRANG: All right. Uh, who did you send over to the Clerk of Court's Office to obtain the hair and fingernail cuttings described in Exhibit 214?
JAMES LENK: Sergeant Mike Shallue went over.
MR. STRANG: All right. I'm sorry, I -- I was calling him deputy and I didn't mean to take him down a rank. Uh, so to your knowledge, Sergeant Mike Shallue went over to the Clerk of Court's Office; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Under your direction?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: And then brought these items back to you in the sheriff's office?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, he did not.
MR. STRANG: How did you come to compare the form?
JAMES LENK: The form was prepared and given to him before he went to the Clerk of Court's Office.
MR. STRANG: So you didn't -- you were signing this form as a transmittal of criminal evidence and didn't -- didn't document what he actually obtained or sent?
JAMES LENK: That's true.
MR. STRANG: Trusted -- entrusted him with the task?
JAMES LENK: Him and the Court, yes.
MR. STRANG: And, then, presumably, that went off to the State Crime Lab?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Were you still the evidence custodian when it came back?
JAMES LENK: Yes. But I had no knowledge of when it came back.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Do -- do you even know that it did come back?
JAMES LENK: I don't know if it did come back.
MR. STRANG: You have no reason to doubt it?
JAMES LENK: I would assume it came back. I don't know that.
MR. STRANG: So would I. I mean, but you just don't know one way or the other. Um, in relation -- Well, the -- the Sheriff's Department in Manitowoc County, and let's use 2002 as our time reference, September of 2002, uh, was located in the same building that houses the jail?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Just south of -- What is it? Eighth and Washington?
JAMES LENK: Actually, it's on Ninth Street.
MR. STRANG: Or between Ninth and Eighth?
JAMES LENK: Ninth and Eighth.
MR. STRANG: Okay. But south of Washington Street, if I have my directions right?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. And what's that -- what's that large building that stands just to the north of the Sheriff's Department and the jail, I don't know, 50 yards to the north or something?
JAMES LENK: It's the courthouse.
MR. STRANG: Right across, sort of, a courtyard or a -- there's a -- some walkways or a monument there?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And where is the Clerk of Court's Office?
JAMES LENK: Would be on the first floor.
MR. STRANG: Of the courthouse?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, you were interviewed by the gentleman over farthest to the right in the back, uh, Special Agent Tom Fassbender, uh, on December 8, 2006. Does that sound right?
JAMES LENK: Sounds about right, yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, you knew that a question had been raised about this vial of blood that Mr. Kratz referred to?
JAMES LENK: I was informed that day by Agent Fassbender that the blood vial existed.
MR. STRANG: And he wanted to ask some questions of you about that blood vial?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Explained to you that an issue had been -- had been raised about integrity of this investigation?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, and you wanted to answer his questions?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: You wanted to answer them truthfully?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: To clear up any questions about the blood vial or the integrity of the investigation?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You would be truthful, in any event, when answering the law enforcement officer's questions?
JAMES LENK: Is that a question, sir?
MR. STRANG: Yes.
JAMES LENK: Yes, I would.
MR. STRANG: Uh, lying to a law enforcement officer who's performing his duties is, itself, a crime --
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: -- in the state of Wisconsin? Sir, you are -- you told Special Agent Fassbender on -- on December 8 that, um -- that you had filled out this Evidence Transmittal Form? Exhibit 214?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Just as you told us today, uh, that you wrote on the transmittal form that, uh, the exhibits had been held by the court since the end of the trial?
JAMES LENK: That's what I was told. Yes.
MR. STRANG: That's what you told Special Agent Fassbender?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, you -- you told him -- you told Special Agent Fassbender, as well, that, uh, it was your memory that -- that, uh, Sergeant Shallue had obtained the items from the clerk's -- Clerk of Court's Office and transmitted them from there?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Were you interviewed just about a month later, um, by an Investigator Steier from the Calumet County Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: Could be. I don't -- I believe so. I'm not sure.
MR. STRANG: Which -- which part are you not sure about?
JAMES LENK: I'm not sure of the date. I know I did talk to Investigator Steier.
MR. STRANG: Fair enough. Um, I'll show you -- I guess I'll mark this, but I'm just going to use this to try to refresh your recollection.
(Exhibit No. 215 marked for identification.)
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) I suggest the date of that interview may have been January 11, 2007, but I will show you Exhibit 215 just to see whether or not it refreshes your recollection about Investigator Steier interviewing you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, it does.
MR. STRANG: Was that interview in person?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Investigator Steier also, obviously, is a law enforcement officer?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, he is.
MR. STRANG: And on January 11, 2007, did you tell Investigator Steier that you had no idea the Steven Avery file was kept in the Manitowoc County Clerk of Court's Office?
JAMES LENK: I didn't know there was a file over there, no. All I knew about is what I had sent out. I didn't know there was a file there.
MR. STRANG: You didn't know there was a file, but you knew that there were exhibits from the file?
JAMES LENK: I didn't know there were other exhibits over there other than the one that I had dealt with.
MR. STRANG: So you thought that perhaps the hair and fingernail cuttings were the -- the only exhibits that the court had held since the end of the trial?
JAMES LENK: I didn't know.
MR. STRANG: I mentioned earlier that you're, in terms of rank, probably the fourth ranking person today in the Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: I'm one of four lieutenants that is fourth ranking, yes.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And -- and that's where I was going. You're fourth in terms of rank, but some of the positions above you or parallel with you have more than one person filling or with that rank; correct?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: So that -- In other words, there may be two deputy inspectors?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Both of whom outrank you?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You're one of four lieutenants?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: But are you part of the scene or management team of the Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: I'm not sure I understand your question.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And I -- it may -- that may not be a term you -- you folks use. So let's start with, are you -- are you part of management, so to speak?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, are you included in meetings about the overall operation of the Department?
JAMES LENK: Not most of the time, no, sir.
MR. STRANG: Simply responsible, most of the time, for the operation of the Detective Bureau?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: You are the only lieutenant of detectives?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Do you know, as you sit here today, Lieutenant Lenk, uh, how many keys the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department has to the Clerk of Court's Office?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I have no idea.
MR. STRANG: Do you know that the Sheriff's Department is responsible for security in the Manitowoc County Courthouse?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That courthouse, of course, includes the Clerk of Court's Office; right?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And a number of other offices in the courthouse?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: The Sheriff's Department has overall responsibility for security in that entire building?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And its offices?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: To maintain security, or to discharge that duty, the Sheriff's Department needs access to the courthouse?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Needs access to all the offices in the courthouse?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Has one or more master keys to your knowledge?
JAMES LENK: I would assume so. I have no idea.
MR. STRANG: And, in any event, you don't know how many such master keys your Department may have?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: I want to move to Mr. Avery's civil lawsuit, all right? Uh, and the backdrop on that is -- is Mr. Avery being released from prison. You remember that?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That made big news?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it did.
MR. STRANG: 2003?
JAMES LENK: Yeah, I believe it was 2003.
MR. STRANG: Uh, and by "big news" I mean, this was something that was on the televisions?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it was.
MR. STRANG: You recall it being in the newspapers?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You recall the newspapers, uh, shining a light, so to speak, on your Department?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Examining the way that earlier conviction had been handled?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You understood that your Department had been the investigating agency in the 1985 case?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You understood that that investigative process led to serious charges being brought against Mr. Avery?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Ultimately, led to his conviction?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And that it turned out he hadn't committed the crimes?
JAMES LENK: According to the release, yes, apparently he had not.
MR. STRANG: Do you have any question about that?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I don't.
MR. STRANG: Any doubt in your mind about whether Mr. Avery was innocent of the crimes for which he was convicted?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I have no knowledge of the case. I would not hazard a guess one way or the other.
MR. STRANG: Simply a matter on which you have no opinion?
JAMES LENK: Pretty much.
MR. STRANG: Is this another one of these things that you didn't care about one way or another?
JAMES LENK: I would say other than the fact that it involved my Department, I really didn't care one way or the other.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And that was a phrase you -- you recall using just yesterday when Mr. Kratz asked you how you felt about or what you cared about Mr. Avery's lawsuit?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Now, you remember -- not the exact time, of course -- but you remember the general event of Mr. Avery filing a civil lawsuit?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Filed it against Manitowoc County?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Relating to the actions of the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe that's what it was.
MR. STRANG: That is a sheriff's office in the state of Wisconsin as a county office; correct?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, so you understood that the lawsuit put in issue the actions of your Department?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Did you care when that lawsuit was filed?
JAMES LENK: I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, sir.
MR. STRANG: Did you care about the lawsuit being filed?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: Didn't care at all that the county was being sued over the actions of your Department?
JAMES LENK: I didn't have any involvement in the case and I really didn't have an opinion one way or the other.
MR. STRANG: And you didn't care one way or the other who won the lawsuit, if I understood your testimony?
JAMES LENK: I didn't say anything about caring who won or not, I just said I didn't really care about the lawsuit.
MR. STRANG: Didn't care about the lawsuit. If you didn't care about the lawsuit, then I guess you didn't care one way or the other who won or lost?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: You didn't or -- or are you agreeing or --
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I didn't care one way or the other.
MR. STRANG: All right. And do I understand you to be saying that you didn't care one way or the other, then, whether someone who had been wrongfully convicted got some compensation for that?
JAMES LENK: I felt if he was wrongly convicted then, yes, he should have some compensation.
MR. STRANG: Then how is it that you didn't care one way or the other?
JAMES LENK: I didn't really have a strong opinion one way or the other.
MR. STRANG: All right. But if he happened to get some compensation, that would be all right for you?
JAMES LENK: That would be fine.
MR. STRANG: All right. Uh, do you think somebody who goes to prison for a long time for a crime he didn't commit ought to get some compensation?
JAMES LENK: I believe so.
MR. STRANG: But you didn't have a strong opinion about that one way or the other?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, did you have a strong opinion one way or the other about the fact that the man your Department missed back in 1985 was out free on the streets because Mr. Avery was doing his time?
MR. KRATZ: Objection, relevance, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Uh, Mr., uh, Strang?
MR. STRANG: I'm -- I'm exploring his attitudes about the lawsuit and its consequences.
MR. KRATZ: This isn't a consequence of the lawsuit at all, Judge.
THE COURT: Yeah. I'm going to sustain the objection.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) Do you care one way or the other, Lieutenant Lenk, about whether your Department gets the right guy in a criminal investigation?
JAMES LENK: Definitely.
MR. STRANG: That you do care about?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And what's your preference?
JAMES LENK: I'm not sure what your question is, sir.
MR. STRANG: Well, since you cared about whether they do or don't get the right guy, what's your preference?
JAMES LENK: My preference is you always try to get the right person.
MR. STRANG: Now, this was the lawsuit that eventually led to your deposition?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Your deposition on, I think, October 11, 2005?
JAMES LENK: I believe that's the date. I'm not positive.
MR. STRANG: I won't even bother to mark this, but I don't want to have you have any questions about it. I'm showing you the transcript of your deposition. What's the date of that deposition?
JAMES LENK: October 11, 2005.
MR. STRANG: That's you with your picture on the front?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Lieutenant Lenk, was October 11, 2005, the first time you had ever had your deposition taken?
JAMES LENK: Regarding this lawsuit?
MR. STRANG: Regarding anything.
JAMES LENK: No, sir. I believe I've had done it at least once before.
MR. STRANG: Had -- had a deposition before. All right. Uh, this was, though, something unusual for you?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: You were subpoenaed?
JAMES LENK: Is that a question, sir, or --
MR. STRANG: Yes.
JAMES LENK: Yes, I was.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, you asked, uh -- or you were asked a number of questions?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: You under -- you un -- you understand that this process here that we're doing, I'm the one asking questions? So I'm speaking to you. I'm asking you a question?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And you're providing answers?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I am.
MR. STRANG: Uh, you provided answers at the deposition in much the same format, didn't you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: And I think you told us that one -- sort of the major topic of this deposition was the telephone call that Sergeant Colborn, in fact, when he was in the jail, had received some years earlier?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Sergeant Colborn told you about that telephone call, didn't he?
JAMES LENK: Yes, in 2003.
MR. STRANG: That is, he told you about it on the very day of Steven Avery's release or the very next day, didn't he?
JAMES LENK: I don't recall. It could have been, yes.
MR. STRANG: But you all were having a conversation about Mr. Avery being released from prison; right?
JAMES LENK: I don't know if we were having a conversation about that specifically, no.
MR. STRANG: But, in any event, uh, whether there was a conversation or not, uh, Officer Colborn had given you this information, uh, and you thought it may or may not be relevant?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, you should -- you -- you told Officer Colborn he ought to pass it along to the sheriff?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And the two of you went to Sheriff Peterson together about it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe we did.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, Sheriff Peterson suggested that maybe the two of you ought to prepare a short report or statement about that?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: You prepared that statement on September 12, 2003?
JAMES LENK: I believe it was that same day, yes.
MR. STRANG: Do you recall that, or do you not, as being the day after Steven Avery was released from prison?
JAMES LENK: I don't specifically recall if that was the same day.
MR. STRANG: Did you consider the possibility that you might be added as a defendant to that civil lawsuit?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: Never crossed your mind?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, Teresa Halbach. It's November 3, 2005 when you first learned that she is missing?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: She's reported missing by another county? Not Manitowoc County?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it was Calumet County.
MR. STRANG: The adjoining county, but a different county altogether?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Uh, this is, at that point, their missing person investigation?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You at -- at the time, November 3, 2005, uh, were then, as you are now, the chief detective, if you will, for Manitowoc County?
JAMES LENK: Lieutenant of detectives, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That is in charge of all of the other detectives in the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You also have some duties as a detective yourself in the field, so to speak?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Is it true, sir, that within two hours after that missing person report to Calumet County, you, on your own, were calling Investigator Mark Wiegert asking about it?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, that's not true.
MR. STRANG: Well, how did you learn about it?
JAMES LENK: Investigator Wiegert called me and told me that he needed assistance.
MR. STRANG: I'm saying Investigator Wiegert --
(Exhibit No. 216 marked for identification.)
MR. KRATZ: I'm sorry. Could we approach, please?
(Discussion off the record.)
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) When you say Investigator Wiegert, you're -- you're referring to the gentleman behind me with the neatly trimmed goatee?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You know him to be one of the two lead case investigators on this investigation?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Had you known Investigator Wiegert before, uh, Ms. Halbach was reported missing?
JAMES LENK: I had met him on a couple of occasions, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Professionally?
JAMES LENK: Professionally, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Some collaboration between your two departments is not unusual?
JAMES LENK: That's right.
MR. STRANG: Because you're adjoining counties?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And you're quite sure that it was Investigator Wiegert who called you, not the other way around?
JAMES LENK: All I know is that I did talk to Investigator Wiegert. I don't know who called who --
MR. STRANG: Oh.
JAMES LENK: -- at this point.
MR. STRANG: All right. So if Investigator Wiegert says that you were the one who called him, you're now prepared to accept that?
JAMES LENK: I would have had to had some reason to call him. Uh, I may have been paged by dispatch or some other reason, but that would have been the reason --
MR. STRANG: May have --
JAMES LENK: -- I would have called him.
MR. STRANG: -- may have heard about this missing person from Detective Remiker? Someone else under you?
JAMES LENK: That's possible.
MR. STRANG: All right. It is possible, then, that you were the one who placed the call to Investigator Wiegert?
JAMES LENK: That's possible.
MR. STRANG: You wouldn't disagree with him if that's the way he put it on paper?
JAMES LENK: If that's how he put it on paper, he's probably right.
MR. STRANG: While we're on that subject, could -- did I understand you correctly that -- I'm jumping ahead here a couple of days to November 5 -- that it was your understanding that Calumet County Sheriff's Department would write all the reports in this case?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, that was my understanding.
MR. STRANG: How many Manitowoc County sheriff's officers were involved in this investigation?
JAMES LENK: There were a number of officers involved.
MR. STRANG: A number. Meaning over a dozen probably?
JAMES LENK: I don't know. I don't know the exact number.
MR. STRANG: Well, you were out at the Avery property yourself, weren't you, from November 5 through at least November 9?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: During, essentially, all of your working hours?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Did you see more than a dozen of your fellow officers from Manitowoc there?
JAMES LENK: I know there was a lot of them out there. I don't know if it's more than a dozen, you know.
MR. STRANG: You've described working directly with at least two of them; right?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Sergeant Colborn and Detective Remiker?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You -- you people were actively searching buildings, cars, garages, all sorts of places on that property?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You were identifying evidence?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, we were attempting to identify evidence.
MR. STRANG: You interviewed people?
JAMES LENK: I think the only interview was on the fourth with Mr. Avery.
MR. STRANG: That -- in which you personally participated?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And it was your understanding that you weren't going to prepare any reports as a -- as a Department about any of that?
JAMES LENK: We were told when we were assigned to do searching to let them do the report writing, to take the evidence, and, basically, we're -- we were just there as support to do the searching.
MR. STRANG: Have you ever been involved in an investigation before in which it was decided beforehand that you would not write reports about what you were doing?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Have you been involved in one since when it was decided you would not write reports about what you were doing?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: You understand that when you write a report, you're committing yourself to paper on what the facts are that are described in the report? You understand that, don't you?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: And if you don't write a report, I guess you're not committed to any version of the facts, are you?
JAMES LENK: We're committed to the facts. We just didn't write the reports.
MR. STRANG: Ah. But how would one know what it is that you say the facts are if you haven't put them down on paper? How would we learn that?
JAMES LENK: From the officer that wrote the reports.
MR. STRANG: From the officer who wrote the reports or by hearing you testify in court?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Well, as it happens, you eventually did prepare something of a report here, didn't you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: A page or two?
JAMES LENK: I believe it was a page, yes.
MR. STRANG: Now, you mentioned just a moment ago the November 4 interview with Mr. Avery?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: This is the morning after Ms. Halbach has been reported missing?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And you, personally, as the lieutenant of detectives, took it upon yourself to go out and interview Mr. Avery?
JAMES LENK: As I had said before, we were requested by Investigator Wiegert to go out and reinterview Mr. Avery.
MR. STRANG: Did Mr. Wiegert request that you, personally, go out and interview Mr. Avery?
JAMES LENK: I don't recall. I don't -- I don't recall if it was specific or just asked someone to go out and interview him.
MR. STRANG: All right. And you decided that one of those people would be you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, then, you took Detective Remiker with you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: He's a detective working under you, obviously?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Experienced detective?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, number of years of service as a detective in the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: I don't know how many years he's got. Probably three or four.
MR. STRANG: Was he capable of, uh, interviewing somebody at 10:30 on a Friday morning?
JAMES LENK: More than capable, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: At that point, uh, Steven Avery was just a person of interest?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: So the two of you went out to Mr. Avery's?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: He was cooperative?
JAMES LENK: Yes, he was.
MR. STRANG: Uh, when Detective Remiker asked if you folks could take a walk through his house, he said, sure, or words to that effect?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Gave you his consent, as they say?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You walked through the entire house quickly?
JAMES LENK: Detective Remiker walked through the house, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You stayed outside?
JAMES LENK: I stayed in the living room with Mr. Avery.
MR. STRANG: Did you have any information on the morning of November 4 about the, uh -- the sort of car that Ms. Halbach was driving when last seen at least?
JAMES LENK: I believe, uh, we had the information that it was a Toyota Rav 4.
MR. STRANG: Did you have a license plate number?
JAMES LENK: I didn't. No, sir. I don't recall having a license plate number.
MR. STRANG: All right. You don't know if anyone else did or did not?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: You worked, though, a number of years in the road patrol division yourself?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: It was common, uh, in road patrol to call in a license plate?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That might be a traffic stop; correct?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Where -- where you would then call into dispatch with the license plate that you were seeing and dispatch could tell you to whom the plate was registered?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Dispatch could also tell you what car the plate ought to be on?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And this would be done, typically, over the radio?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Road patrol officers have a radio unit in their car? Their squad car?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And then, also, have a collar mike?
JAMES LENK: Some wear the collar mike, yes.
MR. STRANG: Some do. Others have a portable?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: But -- but all of the road patrol officers have both a radio in the squad car and some sort of portable radio that goes with them?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Typically, when you're calling in a license plate, you would use the radio when you're on duty?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: A radio, uh, though, is something that citizens, if they have a police scanner, can overhear?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, if it's a regular frequency, yes.
MR. STRANG: Right. I mean, it's -- it's -- it's a -- a broadcast frequency?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: I want you to -- to listen to Exhibit 212.
MR. KRATZ: I'm sorry, Judge. Is this -- is this witness involved in this call? If not, it will be hearsay.
MR. STRANG: I -- I'm not offering it for the truth.
MR. KRATZ: Then what's the relevance, Judge?
THE COURT: Um --
MR. STRANG: First of all, I can't get it to make noise at all.
THE COURT: All right. It's, uh, 10:30. Let's do this; uh, we'll take our morning break at this time. Uh, the jury can be excused. Uh, members of the jury, do not discuss this case, uh, during the break. Uh, we'll resume in approximately 15 minutes.
(Jurors out at 10:25 a.m.)
THE COURT: The record should reflect at this time the court jury is outside of the courtroom and I've ex -- excused the witness as well. Uh, Mr. Kratz? Uh, just -- I -- I assume that what, Mr. Strang, you're about to play is the, um, radio transmission involving Mr. Colborn, uh, confirming a plate number?
MR. STRANG: Well, um, yes and no. I'm -- What I'm trying to establish here is that this is not a radio transmission, but this is a telephone call.
THE COURT: All right. And the purpose for which you're offering it?
MR. STRANG: Um, the -- the purpose is to show that the ordinary thing, if one is on duty, would have been to use the radio, not a telephone, for such an inquiry.
THE COURT: Okay. Are you going to ask the witness whether it was standard practices or something to that effect?
MR. STRANG: I al -- that I think I already -- I just did, I believe.
THE COURT: Okay. Mr. Kratz?
MR. KRATZ: And I think he has. If that's the only purpose, he can ask him: Isn't it typical to, uh -- to use the radio? He already played this for Mr. Colborn. With this witness, it is, in fact, hearsay, uh, and we're objecting.
MR. STRANG: I just need to identify it as a -- as a phone call not a -- not a radio call. Uh, that probably could be done without playing the whole thing that is --
THE COURT: You're going to ask this witness to confirm it was a -- was a telephone call and not a radio call?
MR. STRANG: Correct.
THE COURT: How's he going to know that?
MR. STRANG: Oh, I can raise some foundation on the taping system there and I suppose he should know it because of the ringing sound at the beginning.
THE COURT: Oh.
MR. STRANG: Or the way the dispatcher answers the phone.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Kratz?
MR. KRATZ: There's probably some reason he didn't do this with Mr. Colborn when it was played to him. I don't know what. So he can play it again? I -- I don't understand, Judge. If he has some specialized knowledge in listening to telephone calls versus radio --
THE COURT: Well, we won't know until we hear the witness' answer whether he knows it or not. Um, so I -- um, may be that I -- I believe that they're entitled to ask the question.
Uh, I also wanted to put on the record that, uh, we did hold a brief, uh, sidebar, uh, during the -- Mr. Lenk's testimony requested by Mr. Kratz. That involved, uh, an anticipated hearsay exception that I believe did not develop because of the nature of the questioning which followed.
Uh, that's the type of discussion that, really, the appeals courts tell us we're not supposed to have in a sidebar. So I'm going to ask the attorneys at this point, if you've got some short procedural matters that you want to ask the Court to deal with, that doesn't require excusing the jury, I'll entertain that during the sidebar and make a record of it later. Uh, but if it's going to be a substantive, uh, objection of some kind or something, uh, even though it may slow us down a bit, I'm going to ask that you ask if we can excuse the jury, and then I'll hear you outside the presence of the jury.
MR. KRATZ: We'll do that, Judge.
MR. STRANG: Agreed. Thank you.
THE COURT: All right. We'll resume at, uh, 10 to 11 on that clock.
(Recess had at 10:29 a.m.)
(Reconvened at 10:52 a.m.; jurors present.)
THE COURT: Do we have, uh, Mr. Lenk available? Mr. Strang, you may resume your questioning.
MR. STRANG: Thank you, Your Honor.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) Lieutenant Lenk, when we took our break, I think you had just explained to the jurors that, uh, certainly the typical procedure in calling in a license plate check would be for the road patrol officer to use the radio?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, are you familiar with the -- the taping system on telephone lines at the Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: Vaguely familiar, yes.
MR. STRANG: Okay. You know that dispatch radio traffic is tape recorded? All of it? The radio traffic?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. Some of the telephone lines that the dispatchers answer also are tape recorded?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's not something known by every officer in the Department?
JAMES LENK: I wouldn't know if they all know about it. I mean, the majority probably know about it.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Something you've learned in your management position?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Now, I'm going to -- I'm going to play Exhibit 212 for you. Uh, your voice is not on here. We've heard testimony about this. But I -- I want you to listen to whether you can identify, uh, whether this appears to be a radio call or a call on a telephone line. Okay?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
(Where in recording is played.)
JAMES LENK: "Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department. This is Lynn."
"Lynn."
"Hi, Andy.
(Unintelligible) "Henry 582. See if it comes back (unintelligible).
(Unintelligible) "Henry 582. I -- I (unintelligible) All righty. Do you speak any Spanish there, Andy?"
"No."
"I just got a call (unintelligible) call me back. (Unintelligible) If I get in trouble, Andy, I get in trouble. You know, what am I supposed to do?"
"Well --
"My -- my favorite one is in the city of Manitowoc. It is. Um, okay. Shows that she's a missing person. And it was to Teresa Halbach."
"Okay."
"Okay. That's what you're looking for, Andy?"
"'99 Toyota?"
"Yep."
"Okay. Thank you."
"You're very welcome. Bye-bye."
MR. STRANG: Okay. First of all, did you -- did you recognize the voices?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: Lynn is a dispatcher at the Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Andy is Andy Colborn?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it sounded like Andy Colborn.
MR. STRANG: Sergeant Andy Colborn?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: And were you able to tell, in listening to Exhibit 212, this -- this sounds like a -- a routine license plate check?
JAMES LENK: It sounds like a license plate check. Uh, it sounded like it was over the telephone.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Not over the radio?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Now, if -- if it's over the telephone, this is, in a sense, private from anybody with a police scanner?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: When you're off duty, uh, in the road patrol division, I take it you do not carry a police radio?
JAMES LENK: I don't. No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Others don't either?
JAMES LENK: I wouldn't know if everybody doesn't.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Well, the -- the -- the, uh, portable radios are Sheriff's Department equipment?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, they are.
MR. STRANG: They're not to be taken home ordinarily?
JAMES LENK: Uh, they can be taken home. There's chargers that are kept at home also.
MR. STRANG: In case you get called in from home?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: All right. Squad cars are not taken home?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: So, obviously, the radio in the squad car wouldn't -- wouldn't be available to somebody, uh, when he's off duty?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, um, let's go back to November 5. You, um -- you get a call while you're off duty, uh, sometime that morning?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, you, uh, tell your wife you're sorry but you got to go in to work?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: There's -- there's this stop at Wendy's, um, on the way?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um, from Wendy's, essentially, you go home and then off to work?
JAMES LENK: That is correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, what you testified, uh, yesterday, as I understood you, is that you arrived at the Avery salvage property just shortly after 2:00, 2:05 or something like that?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: That was your testimony? That's your best recollection?
JAMES LENK: That was my recollection after reviewing some tapes from dispatch.
MR. STRANG: I see. Uh, tapes like the ones we just listened to?
JAMES LENK: Yes. These would have been radio logs.
MR. STRANG: As opposed to telephone line tapes like this?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You can tell the difference between a -- a radio tape and a telephone tape?
JAMES LENK: I can't, but I -- it would be on the way it's handled as far as, uh, calling you, using your call numbers as opposed to --
MR. STRANG: Right. I mean, so, in effect, you can tell the difference if you're listening to a tape?
JAMES LENK: Right.
MR. STRANG: First of all, any number of people could be calling in and conversing with the dispatcher?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You folks use your squad numbers?
JAMES LENK: We use our employee numbers.
MR. STRANG: Or a -- a three-digit number?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Um, and in that radio traffic, you -- you -- we sometimes hear the, uh, term "I'm in code." Are you familiar with that term?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: What does that mean?
JAMES LENK: It's a separate radio frequency that is not normally monitored by the general public.
MR. STRANG: But what -- we're hearing it while the person's in code, or is that telling the dispatcher to go to a separate radio frequency?
JAMES LENK: That's telling the dispatcher to go to a separate frequency.
MR. STRANG: And is that frequency also taped?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe it is.
MR. STRANG: Now, so you -- you had a chance to review some of this radio traffic on the tapes?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I didn't review it. I just -- times.
MR. STRANG: I'm sorry?
JAMES LENK: I just didn't review the tapes. All I did review is the time that I arrived.
MR. STRANG: All right. That -- that helped you decide that probably 2 or 2:05, somewhere in there, you arrived at the Avery property?
JAMES LENK: Correct. The tape actually -- or the report actually said 2:06.
MR. STRANG: The, uh, subject of when you arrived, uh, at the Avery property that day has, uh -- has come up before in this case, hasn't it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: In fact, you've given testimony about that very topic before?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You gave testimony under oath back on August 9, 2006?
JAMES LENK: I believe that was the date, yes.
MR. STRANG: In any event, you remember one event, a hearing in which you were under oath?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, the oath, of course, was the same you took today?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And were you asked on that occasion, uh, the follow questions and did you give these answers?
MR. STRANG: Page 197, Counsel.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang)
"And did you, in fact, arrive at the Avery property?"
Your answer: "Yes."
"Question: Do you know what time?"
"Answer: I'm not sure of the exact time. Somewhere, 6:30 or 7 that evening. I'm not positive." Were you asked those questions and did you give those answers?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: I'm sorry?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: Uh, and, then, a few moments later, uh, in the same hearing, were you asked, again, this time I think by one of the prosecutors, uh --
"Question: All right."
MR. STRANG: Page 216, Counsel. I'm sorry.
MR. STRANG: "All right. And when did you arrive at the property, the morning or the afternoon?"
Your answer: "Late afternoon."
"Question: Late afternoon?"
"Answer: Yes." Did you give that testimony?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I did.
MR. STRANG: Now, uh, you don't recall signing in on a log when you arrived at the Avery property on November 5, do you?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I don't recall signing in.
MR. STRANG: You do recall signing out?
JAMES LENK: I believe by then there was an officer at the end of the road, yes.
MR. STRANG: So if we were to look through the log sheets, we would look in vain for any spot where you're signed in that day?
JAMES LENK: As far as I know. I -- I don't have access to the loggings.
MR. STRANG: Right. I -- I'm just -- I do, and I don't see your name. That's your understanding?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I understand.
MR. STRANG: I do see you signing out at 10:41 p.m. That sound right?
JAMES LENK: Sounds about right, yes.
MR. STRANG: Okay. We are -- we have this. I can offer you the exhibit if you'd like.
MR. STRANG: One forty-two. Ms. Bonin?
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) I show you Exhibit 142. Let's see. We can probably take these away so that -- got good housekeeping. That look like the log from the Avery property from November 5, 2005?
JAMES LENK: Yes. It looks like that, yes.
MR. STRANG: And if you flip through to 10:41 p.m.? I don't remember if it's military, or a.m./p.m. time, but --
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You, and Detective Remiker, and Sergeant Colborn are signing out at the same time?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, you understand that, um, if you had arrived at 6:30 or 7 at the Avery property, it would be a little hard to explain why -- why you're not on the log signing in; wouldn't it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it would.
MR. STRANG: If you arrived, though, uh, even in the late afternoon, that would be hard to explain why you hadn't signed in?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: But if you arrived at about 2, or 2:05, 2:06, then that may have been before anyone started keeping a log?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Under those circumstances, the fact that you didn't sign in, would not look strange or odd?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Sometime shortly after you arrived at the Avery property, uh, you did go down to the southeast corner of that property?
JAMES LENK: Yeah, I went -- Yes, sir, I went down to that area.
MR. STRANG: We've all seen the picture until we -- we're blue in the face, and you -- but do you need it to help you?
JAMES LENK: I went down to the area where the squad cars were sitting.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And there was a pond there and -- lying in front of you?
JAMES LENK: Yeah. I'm not sure if it was a pond, but there was a depression of some sort.
MR. STRANG: Sure. And a car crusher off to the left somewhere?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: And did you go up onto the ridge behind the depression, uh, to get closer to the Toyota?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: How far -- how close to the Toyota did you go?
JAMES LENK: Where those vehicles were parked. The, uh, squad cars.
MR. STRANG: And your testimony is that you approached no closer than that parking area sort of to the -- to the right of the, uh -- of the car crusher?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: It was, uh, getting dark by the time you went down to that area?
JAMES LENK: I don't know exactly what time. I don't think it was getting quite dark. I could still fairly see, but it was getting dark.
MR. STRANG: Well, you were, uh, asked, again, at that -- at that August 9 hearing, uh, pages 197 to 198:
"Did you go down to the area where it, meaning the Toyota, had been located?"
And your answer was: "I went down there with another officer. He showed me the location where it was, but I didn't get -- I didn't really see it. I mean, from what I seen, it was getting dark, and it was hidden, but I didn't get a good look at it." Is that your testimony on August 9?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it is.
MR. STRANG: I can show you the transcript if you have any questions.
JAMES LENK: No, that's fine.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Uh, now, later that evening, or afternoon, you, um -- you volunteered to be one of the officers who searched Steven Avery's residence?
JAMES LENK: We were asked to assist in searching the residence, yes.
MR. STRANG: Well, all right. Page 203. Do you recall being asked this question and did you give this answer?
"So you volunteered to be one of the officers who searched Steven Avery's residence?"
Your answer: "Yes, sir." Was that your testimony?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, then, uh, as far as you know, Lieutenant Lenk, Sergeant Colborn also volunteered to be one of the searchers of Steven Avery's residence?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe so.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, Detective Remiker?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir. Correct.
MR. STRANG: Now, that first search on November 5, uh, started about 7:30 in the evening?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: When I say the first search, the first in which you were involved under a search warrant?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Lasted a little over two-and-a-half hours?
JAMES LENK: That's -- that's about right. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um, actually were four of you in that search party; isn't that right?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Lenk, Colborn, Remiker, and Mr. Tyson?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Tyson was from Calumet County of course?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: The rest of you from Manitowoc County?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Now, you -- I guess as you described it here today, that was -- or -- and yesterday, was -- I don't know if these were your words exactly, but that was more of a general search? Not as thorough as a later search?
JAMES LENK: It was a general search, yes.
MR. STRANG: But with four of you? Not just three as there were on November 8?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: And a full two-and-a-half hours? Not just about an hour on November 8?
JAMES LENK: I thought November 8 was a little longer.
MR. STRANG: A little longer than an hour?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: All right. But you know that, uh, November 5 was two-and-a-half hours or maybe a shade over?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, the fact is, when you -- when you left on November 5, you did believe that you had seized everything of evidentiary value at that time?
JAMES LENK: At that time, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Sergeant Tyson, uh, was there for the, um, purpose of collecting evidence on November 5?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: He also kept an eye on all of the searchers?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You understood that, uh, a Calumet officer was to be with all searchers at all times on that property?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: He stuck close to you as you searched on November 5?
JAMES LENK: We were all in the same trailer. We were close to each other, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Were you ever out of Sergeant Tyson's eyeshot? Eyesight?
JAMES LENK: I don't believe so, no.
MR. STRANG: No. He stuck pretty close to all three of you at all times, didn't he?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: It would have been hard for you to do anything unobserved by Sergeant Tyson on November 5?
JAMES LENK: I would believe so, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: One of the things that, uh, he saw you doing was bagging up some evidence near the end, wasn't it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, it was at his direction.
MR. STRANG: So he didn't actually collect everything? He directed you to bag some of the evidence?
JAMES LENK: The evidence was already bagged. I was directed on putting numbers on the bags from his identification numbers.
MR. STRANG: All right. Uh, if he described you as being the one who bagged the evidence, you would disagree with that?
JAMES LENK: I would disagree. I think my function at that point was recording numbers on the bags and identification.
MR. STRANG: Then, turning things, ultimately, over to Sergeant Tyson?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, I won't go through all of the searches in any great detail, but you're back in the house on November 6; correct?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, you're in the -- Steven Avery's garage on November 6?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: You described that here today, if I recall right, as being about an hour, maybe an hour-and-a-half, you were in Steven's garage?
JAMES LENK: I believe so.
MR. STRANG: Hour and 47 minutes sound more like it?
JAMES LENK: That could be right, yes.
MR. STRANG: Uh, on the morning of the 6th, when you searched Mr. Avery's garage, you also seized everything that you saw that you thought had evidentiary value that day, didn't you?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, at that time.
MR. STRANG: The, uh, 7th, you're back in his house?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And, of course, the 8th. And, uh, this is the one you say was the thorough search?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: The thorough search with three people, not four?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And, uh -- let's see. If you'll bear with me while I change disks here. Let's see if we can make this work good. That's a little catty-wampus, but I don't know that we've seen this before, but this is a -- a computer- generated image?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Okay. So not a photograph. It's a little bit of make-believe as the computer has it, but do you recognize the, uh -- the model or the -- the image here?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it looks like the, uh, bedroom for Steven Avery.
MR. STRANG: You, uh -- you told us, uh, when, uh, Mr. Kratz was asking you questions that this is a pretty small bedroom?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, it is.
MR. STRANG: Other people have said that, too, and I'm wondering, can you give me a rough approximation of the -- of what small means? How big that bedroom is?
JAMES LENK: Nine by twelve. I don't know. It would be a guess.
MR. STRANG: Okay. Um, and that -- that's a guess. I understand that. So, roughly 9 by 12. If that's a standard size or queen bed, one or the other, it fills up -- the bed fills up a good bit of the room?
JAMES LENK: Quite a bit, yes.
MR. STRANG: Now, this November 8, uh, search, was at least your third time into Mr. Avery's bedroom? Searching it; right?
JAMES LENK: The third time searching his bedroom?
MR. STRANG: Yeah. Or is it just the second? There's certainly November 5 --
JAMES LENK: November 5, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: -- November 6 and November 7. Maybe the 6th you're just taking the guns?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir. I believe --
MR. STRANG: One of those two days you --
JAMES LENK: Right.
MR. STRANG: So you go in the bedroom to take the guns?
JAMES LENK: I didn't take them. I believe I was with whoever took the guns, yes.
MR. STRANG: Fair enough. Um, so you may not have been in the bedroom the day the guns were taken?
JAMES LENK: I'm not sure if I was in there or not.
MR. STRANG: All right. In any event, you are back in the bedroom on the 8th?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: Now, um, you guys are in there almost an hour? Something like that?
JAMES LENK: I would think -- not sure of the time. I think possibly an hour.
MR. STRANG: Okay. What you do know is that you left that bedroom, uh, to go to the living room at some point?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: To get boxes or bags for evidence?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: You see the key immediately after your return from the living room?
JAMES LENK: When I walked into the room, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's when you first see the key?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Another computer animation or computer image?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You see that little, uh -- little item up in the corner next to the bookcase there?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's supposed to be the key?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's about where you saw it?
JAMES LENK: In that general area. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Yeah. But when you saw it, there were a number of things sort of cluttering the room that aren't in the computer image?
JAMES LENK: There was a pair of slippers there. Yes.
MR. STRANG: Pair of slippers, and some sort of a -- looks like a -- a Fu Dog or little Ty lion sort of figure as a doorstop?
JAMES LENK: Something like that.
MR. STRANG: Something like that? Um, a notebook, some other miscellaneous junk in the -- the little bookcase there?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: And a number of other things that just aren't in the computer pictures?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: But the basic location of the key? That's correct?
JAMES LENK: Generally speaking, yes.
MR. STRANG: Now, that key had a -- had a blue -- part of a blue (unintelligible) on it, didn't it?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
COURT REPORTER: Excuse me. A blue what, sir?
MR. STRANG: Lanyard, l-a-n-y-a-r-d, uh, attached to the ring on the key?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe so.
MR. STRANG: And then, uh, at the end of that little lanyard strap was a, uh -- maybe the male end of a -- a black plastic clasp?
JAMES LENK: I don't know if it was the male end or the female end.
MR. STRANG: Neither do I. Maybe a male end, it could have been the female end, but it was one or the other; right?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: The point is, there was some -- some sort of a black chunky half of a clasp at the end of the little lanyard?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um --
MR. STRANG: Do we have Exhibit No. 169 handy?
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) See if we can find a picture that you were shown on your direct examination. A photograph this time. On November 8 -- while we're waiting for the computer to open these -- these things, um, on November 8, did you have any reason to go into Mr. Avery's bathroom? You know, the bathroom, laundry room combination?
JAMES LENK: I think there was a -- some items that had to be collected there. I think it was some suspected blood spatter or something.
MR. STRANG: Blood drops? Something --
JAMES LENK: Yeah.
MR. STRANG: -- something like that? So you were involved in that as well?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not collect that.
MR. STRANG: Uh, were you in the bathroom?
JAMES LENK: I don't recall. I may have been in the bathroom.
MR. STRANG: Certainly, you know you were in there on November 5, the night you did the full, general search of the house?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: The bathroom, uh, you recall as having Mr. Avery's toothbrush?
JAMES LENK: Could be. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Or a toothbrush?
JAMES LENK: Could be. Yes.
MR. STRANG: Razor? Those kinds of --
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: -- ordinary toiletry items?
JAMES LENK: I'm -- I'm assuming if they were there, yes. I don't recall that, but --
MR. STRANG: All right. Now, we've got Exhibit 169 up on the, uh, screen. Let's see. That's not Exhibit 169. That's something else. Um, but this is -- this is the -- the key as you first observed it?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: If I may take the laser pointer here.
MR. KRATZ: It's No. 210, Counsel.
MR. STRANG: Two-ten. Thank you, Mr. Kratz.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) So I've got Exhibit 210 up on the screen, and what we've got here is -- is -- is this -- what we're calling bookcase -- is that in the -- in the position it was when you walk in from the living room and see the key lying there?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I believe so.
MR. STRANG: Not quite flush against the wall, but close?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: And, um, I don't know that we can get any better angle on that, but, um, if -- it looks like the cord running off the, uh, power pack for the phone or whatever that is?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Looks like the -- the cord is pressed up against the wall?
JAMES LENK: I don't know, sir. I can't tell.
MR. STRANG: Okay. What you do -- what you do see is the -- the -- the key there, uh, looks like it's, I don't know, a few, two, three-something inches away from the wall?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Something like that; right?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir. That's correct.
MR. STRANG: And then maybe something like a similar distance off to the side of the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Now -- now that we have that zoomed in, Exhibit 210, tell me, um, there's a key ring; is that -- is that right?
JAMES LENK: That looks like the key ring. Yes.
MR. STRANG: I mean, there was a key ring in other words?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it's that blue whatever it is.
MR. STRANG: All right. Um, and then that -- the -- the blue -- that -- that's blue fabric? The lanyard we were talking about?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: And the -- I guess it's the -- the female end of the clasp?
JAMES LENK: Right.
MR. STRANG: All right. Now, uh, you see a house key on there?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I do not.
MR. STRANG: Garage key?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Um, how about even one work key?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Swipe card for a gym?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Or athletic club?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Just the long Toyota key?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's all that was on it when you saw it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Mr. Buting's going to go back to work and see if he can find this Exhibit 169, which was the picture of the -- the back panel -- the veneer panel on the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: We don't have that. Um, Counsel, is -- is there a -- a regular photograph of Exhibit 169?
MR. KRATZ: Sure. That's where the exhibits are.
MR. STRANG: As opposed to just on the screen?
MR. KRATZ: Yes.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) One sixty-nine?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: You were shown that on direct?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Okay. See if we can do it this way. All right.
MR. STRANG: Mr. Buting, we need the gizmo. And then there's a second gizmo. There we go. Lights, camera, action. All right.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) How's that? Pretty good? Can you see that?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. Now, this photograph, whenever it's taken, is taken after someone has pulled the bookcase away from the wall a little bit?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: That is, in -- in Exhibit 169, the bookcase, is farther away from the wall than it was when you first saw the Toyota key?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: And we can see that back veneer panel, or part of the board, whatever the panel is on the back?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. Did you -- did you touch this bookcase at some point?
JAMES LENK: I had been searching the front of the bookcase. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Okay. And, I mean, was it collected as evidence?
JAMES LENK: The bookcase?
MR. STRANG: Yes.
JAMES LENK: At this time, no, sir.
MR. STRANG: It wasn't?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, did -- did you, uh -- did you have a chance to sort of touch the back panel there after -- after you noticed it sticking out like that?
JAMES LENK: I don't believe so. No, sir.
MR. STRANG: So you -- you don't know whether it, uh -- it's being held out there now and wanted to spring back toward the frame or whether that's its sort of resting position at this point?
JAMES LENK: My estimate would be that's its resting position.
MR. STRANG: So it -- it -- it -- it's tendency there is to spring open, not to spring shut?
JAMES LENK: I wouldn't know. I would think so, but I wouldn't --
MR. STRANG: Well, okay. That's -- that's at least the way you saw and perceived the bookcase after you noticed the back panel loose like that?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, you had been the first one to empty out that bookcase?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I was not. Are we still talking about November 8?
MR. STRANG: Uh, no, I'm just talking the first, uh --
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I was not.
MR. STRANG: -- in general. On the 5th, you were not?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. Did someone empty out that bookcase in your sight?
JAMES LENK: I believe -- yes, it was searched. I don't recall watching them search it. I was on the other side of the room.
MR. STRANG: Okay. But -- but you know that somebody searched it on November 5?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Took all the stuff out?
JAMES LENK: I don't know if they took it all out. No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Or not. All right. Uh, how about on -- on November 8? Do you know whether, uh, Mr. Colborn took all of the stuff out of the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: All the magazines, and the photos, and that type of thing were taken out of the bookcase.
MR. STRANG: So that he could look in the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: I suppose.
MR. STRANG: The bookcase doesn't have cabinet doors on it?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: It's a relatively small piece of furniture?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: Maybe yea high?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: I don't know, 18 inches square on the top? Something like that? Give or take?
JAMES LENK: Approximately.
MR. STRANG: All right. Um, and, uh, did you get a chance to look into the bookcase when it was empty of its contents?
JAMES LENK: I may -- I glanced in there. I didn't really take a hard look in there. No, sir.
MR. STRANG: You didn't see a, uh -- a blue lanyard, and a black clasp, and the Toyota key in the back in that bookcase, did you?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: That's something you would have seen if the bookcase was empty and you'd looked in it?
JAMES LENK: Had I looked closely, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um, you're not -- you're not suggesting that the key, and the lanyard, and the ring, and the clasp were, uh -- were somehow wedged up into the space where the back veneer separates from the frame, are you?
JAMES LENK: That's a possibility, yes.
MR. STRANG: And nobody saw a blue lanyard hanging down?
JAMES LENK: Apparently not, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, and if that -- if that board tends to want to rest at that position, how would somebody have wedged something up in there and kept it there?
JAMES LENK: I have no idea, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, did you look under the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: I'm sure it was looked under when it was tilted to the side. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: All right. You -- you didn't notice any -- any tape or any secret compartment down there to hold something?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: What you did notice is that the, um -- back to the 210. What you did notice is that the, uh -- the key is found not behind the bookcase, is it?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, it was not.
MR. STRANG: Uh, not flush with the wall, was it?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: But to the sides of the bookcase?
JAMES LENK: Back by the corner to the side. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And with -- with all of this which you've described, and I won't even go to later November 8 or November 9, but with all of this, we've got a page or page-and-a-half of police reports from you, didn't we?
JAMES LENK: From myself, sir?
MR. STRANG: Yes.
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Now, November 5, when you, uh -- you volunteered with Mr. Colborn and Mr. Remiker to search Steven Avery's trailer, uh, as of that time you previously had talked with Sergeant Colborn about the depositions the two of you gave?
JAMES LENK: I believe we did at some point. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Talked before the depositions, didn't you?
JAMES LENK: He asked me if I got a -- a deposition subpoena, and I said, yes.
MR. STRANG: And the two of you had a little conversation about that?
JAMES LENK: Yes. I had no idea what I was getting subpoenaed for, and he said it was because of a statement he had made.
MR. STRANG: A statement -- you know, a phone call he had gotten?
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: From a Brown County law enforcement agency?
JAMES LENK: That's what he said, sir.
MR. STRANG: From a detective?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: They had someone in custody?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir. I believe so.
MR. STRANG: Someone who had committed a Manitowoc assault some years prior?
JAMES LENK: It was a Manitowoc assault. I don't know if there was a time attached to it. I'm not sure.
MR. STRANG: At least what Sergeant Colborn told you was there was a few years prior. The detective from the other Brown County agency was telling him.
JAMES LENK: Yes, if that's what's on there.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, the detective also told Colborn that he believed someone already was arrested for the crime?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: So Sergeant Colborn fills you in on what he thinks the depositions are about and, uh, the two of you don't talk about the depositions after them?
JAMES LENK: After the depositions?
MR. STRANG: Right.
JAMES LENK: We may have mentioned it to each other.
MR. STRANG: Okay. But it's less than four weeks later, November 5, and one thing you do know is that you didn't mention that deposition to Special Agent Fassbender?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: You didn't mention it to Investigator Mark Wiegert?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: Didn't hear Sergeant Colborn mention the depositions to either of those two gentlemen either?
JAMES LENK: Not to my recollection. No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Didn't tell Sheriff Pagel that you'd been deposed three, four weeks earlier?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Had Steven Avery actually been sitting there during you deposition?
JAMES LENK: He came in after I had started giving my deposition. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um, without you telling Mr. Fassbender, and Mr. Wiegert, Sheriff Pagel about the deposition, there's really no way they would have known about it, would they have?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: So that's not information they could consider in deciding whether to accept your offer to volunteer to search Mr. Avery's trailer?
JAMES LENK: They didn't have that information, sir.
MR. STRANG: Because you didn't give it to them?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: In effect, you took the decision upon yourself that this was information they didn't need to have?
JAMES LENK: At that time I didn't even think about the deposition.
MR. STRANG: Would it have been a little bit fairer to Mr. Fassbender if you had given him this information so that he, as the lead -- one of the two lead investigators, could have considered it?
JAMES LENK: It would have been more information for him. I don't know if it would have changed his decision.
MR. STRANG: I don't know either, but would it have been fair to give him that information?
JAMES LENK: Had I thought of it, yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Would it have been fair to give that to Mr. Wiegert or Sheriff Pagel?
JAMES LENK: Same answer. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And before you went rummaging through Steven Avery's bedroom once, twice, three times, whatever it was, for hours, would it have been fairer to Steven Avery if someone other than a person who had been deposed in his lawsuit had done that search?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I don't think it would have been.
MR. STRANG: That's all I've got. Oh. I'm -- I'm sorry.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) You came back to Mr. Avery's four months later? Not quite four months later?
JAMES LENK: Yes.
MR. STRANG: March 1 and March 2 of 2006?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Much smaller search this time, wasn't it?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir. I believe it was just the garage.
MR. STRANG: The entire rest of the property was not closed off to the public?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, it was not.
MR. STRANG: The rest of the property was not closed off to the Avery family?
JAMES LENK: I believe it was not. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: A search was going on in the garage?
JAMES LENK: That's correct.
MR. STRANG: You came back?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Did you participate in that search?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. STRANG: Why were you back?
JAMES LENK: I came back to see if they needed any, uh, food, any assistance with supplies, see if I could help out.
MR. STRANG: Both days?
JAMES LENK: I'm not -- I believe I was there both days. I'm not sure.
MR. STRANG: That's all.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Kratz?
REDIRECT EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY KRATZ:
MR. KRATZ: Lieutenant Lenk, I'll start at the -- at the end Mr. Strang's last line of questions. On March 1 or 2 did you ever enter any building on the Avery property?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. KRATZ: Did you ever enter the trailer or the -- especially garage?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Strang asked a series of interesting questions about people that are wrongfully accused of crimes and getting compensation for that. Do you remember that?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I do.
MR. KRATZ: When's the first time, Lieutenant Lenk, that you learned in this case that you were being accused of a crime?
JAMES LENK: After I first observed the key and that came out into the media.
MR. KRATZ: Do you recall your name being on the front page of the newspaper?
JAMES LENK: I believe at some point it was. Yes, sir.
MR. KRATZ: Do you recall being not so subtly suggested that you committed a crime planting evidence in this case?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I do.
MR. KRATZ: How did you feel about that?
JAMES LENK: I was upset, sir. Actually, I was mad.
MR. KRATZ: Did you feel that Mr. Strang or Mr. Buting wrongfully accused you of a crime?
JAMES LENK: I did not commit a crime. If they said I did, then they wrongfully accused me.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Strang asked you whether evidence that goes to the Crime Lab, uh, comes back or how that process works. Do you generally know how that process works?
JAMES LENK: Generally, the evidence that leaves the Manitowoc County Evidence Room is sent to the Crime Lab. It will come back from the Crime Lab to our Department which will subsequently be put back into the evidence room.
MR. KRATZ: Well, the evidence sent in 2002 left the Clerk of Court's Office; is that right?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. KRATZ: Was that ever, to your knowledge, in the Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department?
JAMES LENK: Not to my knowledge.
MR. KRATZ: Was it ever in your possession or under your control?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, it was not.
MR. KRATZ: Do you ever recall seeing that evidence coming back to your possession or control?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. KRATZ: Did you ever see a receipt for that evidence coming back as one of the evidence custodians?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Strang played a -- sounded like a telephone call from Mr. Colborn. Do you know when that call was made?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I do not.
MR. KRATZ: Is there anything on that phone call that can reflect whether it was before or after Mr. Colborn went to Mr. Avery's house?
JAMES LENK: I didn't hear anything on that call. No, sir.
MR. KRATZ: You had mentioned that in the course of your professional duties you've used a -- a cell phone or some means to contact the Sheriff's Department other than a radio; is that correct?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. KRATZ: Just talking about you, personally, Lieutenant Lenk, what are some of the reasons that you would use a cell phone rather than an open air radio?
JAMES LENK: One of the reasons would be, um, privacy of an issue that we're working on. Uh, we wouldn't want it over the general radio. Another reason would be it's probably more of a -- a personal nature, um, get information from the dispatcher. Um, it's not unusual to use cell phones. They're becoming more and more prevalent.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Strang suggested on cross-examination that some citizens actually listen to radio traffic that was called scanners. Remember that question?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I do.
MR. KRATZ: Do you know if Mr. Avery had a scanner in early November of 2005?
JAMES LENK: I know there was a scanner in the business area and shop area. I don't know if Mr. Avery had a scanner.
(Exhibit No. 217 marked for identification.)
MR. KRATZ: I show you what's been marked for identification as Exhibit No. 2-1-7. Do you recognize that location?
MR. BUTING: Sorry. What's the exhibit number?
MR. KRATZ: Two-one-seven. Two seventeen.
JAMES LENK: It looks like the living room area of Mr. Avery's trailer.
MR. KRATZ: (By Attorney Kratz) Do you see an item located on the bar in Mr. Avery's living room?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I do.
MR. KRATZ: Do you know what that item is?
JAMES LENK: It looks like a scanner.
MR. KRATZ: I'm going to show the jury what you've now identified as Exhibit 217. That black item right there, is that what you're talking about?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, that's it.
MR. KRATZ: Now, let me ask you, Lieutenant Lenk, if you were doing a missing persons investigation and you had some information that you wanted to verify, might that be the kind of information that you'd use a cell phone rather than open air radio?
JAMES LENK: Yes, it could be.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Strang asked about the number of searches that occurred inside of Mr. Avery's trailer. Have you been involved in your career as a detective in searches that, um, have required you to go back and search some more for some other items?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. KRATZ: Tell the jury, generally, what -- why that happens? Why would you have to go back and search a second time or a third time in -- in a location?
JAMES LENK: That would happen because you would get -- as you're investigating, you come with more information that would lead you to look for other items of evidence.
MR. KRATZ: In those circumstances, would you think that your first search was sloppy or unprofessionally done?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. KRATZ: You talk about additional information causing a more detailed or directed search. Is that what happened here?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. KRATZ: You think that there was any search that you performed, any search that you individually were involved in, that was unnecessary or was frivolous?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Actually, what he -- what he thinks about that is irrelevant, but we can let the answer stand. That's fine.
THE COURT: Very well.
MR. KRATZ: (By Attorney Kratz) Mr. Strang showed you Exhibit No. 210 and asked whether or not you saw any, um -- I wrote this down -- any house key, any business key, or an athletic club or gym card, you don't see any of that in Exhibit 210, do you?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I did not.
MR. KRATZ: Assuming the evidence later in this case is going to establish that this, in fact, was Ms. Halbach's key, and, in fact, was found in Mr. Avery's bedroom, do you know why Mr. Avery kept Ms. Halbach's car key?
MR. STRANG: Object, Your Honor. That's way beyond and speculative.
THE COURT: I'll sustain the objection.
MR. KRATZ: (By Attorney Kratz) Well, let me ask you this: Do you think Mr. Avery, uh, at any time had any use for Ms. Halbach's athletic fitness card?
MR. STRANG: Speculation. Well beyond his personal knowledge. And argument.
THE COURT: Sustained. I think that's a question for the jury.
MR. KRATZ: (By Attorney Kratz) Finally, Lieutenant Lenk, the, um, defense attorneys have -- or excuse -- excuse me -- Mr. Strang has asked, um, how many pages of reports you individually prepared in this case. Do you remember that question?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir, I do.
MR. KRATZ: Do you know how many pages of reports, Lieutenant -- excuse me -- Sergeant Bill Tyson prepared in this case?
JAMES LENK: I'm not sure. I -- couple pages. I don't know. More than that. He was there at least twice.
MR. KRATZ: Mr. Tyson? Do you know how many pages of reports he's prepared in this case?
JAMES LENK: No, I don't.
MR. KRATZ: Do you know how many pages of reports Deputy Kucharski or Deputy Wendling has prepared?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I don't.
MR. KRATZ: There was a -- a report that you were asked to prepare; is that right?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. KRATZ: And what, specifically, did that entail or involve? Do you remember?
JAMES LENK: It was -- involved the, uh, finding or locating of that key. How that came about.
MR. KRATZ: Okay.
MR. KRATZ: If I could have just one moment, Judge, I'd appreciate it. I think that's all for Lieutenant Lenk. Thank you, Judge. Thank you very much.
THE COURT: Mr. Strang, anything on recross?
MR. STRANG: I do. Just briefly.
RECROSS-EXAMINATION BY ATTORNEY STRANG:
MR. STRANG: Um, scanners are -- are things that all kinds of people have, actually now, including Mr. Avery, apparently; right?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, the Averys, you know, are in the salvage business?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: They run a wrecker or wreckers?
JAMES LENK: That's correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: One would -- one reason to have a police scanner would be to find out when there is a wreck on the roads in the area; right?
JAMES LENK: I believe that could be used for that, sir.
MR. STRANG: Sure. As -- nothing -- nothing unlawful about having a scanner, is there?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: Here, um, in terms of radio calls being picked up, Teresa Halbach's disappearance wasn't a secret, was it?
JAMES LENK: No, sir.
MR. STRANG: And we had Chop -- Chopper 4 and all kinds of media coverage of this by the night of November 3 and November 4, didn't we?
JAMES LENK: I believe so, yes.
MR. STRANG: Yeah. Uh, in fact, there were efforts to enlist the public's help in finding her, weren't there?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Uh, in any missing persons investigation, it might be helpful to have the general public involved?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: Would there have been any reason that her license plate was something of a personal nature as you say?
JAMES LENK: No, sir. I would think not.
MR. STRANG: Any reason to keep that private?
JAMES LENK: I don't know. I wasn't there when the call was made.
MR. STRANG: Any reason you can think of to keep it a secret?
JAMES LENK: Other than to keep it from being too public.
MR. STRANG: Uh, the -- the stuff from the Clerk's Office, I think this is clear, but regardless where it was, or who got it, or who sent it, you're the guy who filled out the evidence transmittal form, aren't you?
JAMES LENK: That was my job. Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: A Manitowoc County Sheriff's Department Evidence Transmittal Form.
JAMES LENK: Correct, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, um, reports, as you've said, you got no idea how many pages of reports, uh, Mr. Tyson, or Mr. Wendling, or Mr. Kuchar -- Kucharski prepared, do you?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I do not.
MR. STRANG: But, if they're witnesses, then we can -- we can learn from them what they reported, and we'll have the benefit of those reports when they testify, won't we?
JAMES LENK: Correct.
MR. STRANG: You don't have any idea how many pages of reports Investigator Wiegert prepared either, do you?
JAMES LENK: No, sir, I do not.
MR. STRANG: But he was one of the two lead investigators? That you knew?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: So when we hear from him, we'll get to find out about all of his reports?
MR. KRATZ: Objection, Judge, assuming a fact not in evidence.
MR. STRANG: Um, I said when we hear from him.
THE COURT: I'll sustain the objection.
MR. STRANG: (By Attorney Strang) Uh, finally, in, uh -- in our system, uh, of criminal justice here in this country, um, which side is it that brings accusations of crime?
JAMES LENK: Normally, the law enforcement, prosecutor side.
MR. STRANG: The -- the prosecution would be the lawyers, uh, who are involved, formally, in accusing people of crime?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: And, uh, what -- what do we do over here at the defense table? What's our role in this system?
JAMES LENK: Providing representation for the defendant.
MR. STRANG: We defend people accused of crimes, don't we?
JAMES LENK: Yes, sir.
MR. STRANG: That's all I have.
THE COURT: Anything else?
MR. KRATZ: Not for this witness. Thank you.
THE COURT: Very well. Mr. Lenk, you are excused. Members of the jury, at this time we're going to take our lunch break. I'll remind you not to, uh, discuss the case among -- among yourselves during the lunch break, and, uh, we'll resume at one o'clock.
(Recess had at 11:57 a.m.)
(Reconvened at 1:01 p.m.)
THE COURT: Mr. Kratz, you may call your next witness.
MR. STRANG: Your Honor, I wonder before we do that, if I might just, uh, move in, uh, exhibits from the last witness. Uh, I think it's 214.
THE COURT: Any objection?
MR. KRATZ: Which is the -- Oh, no, that's fine.
THE COURT: Very well. Exhibit 214 is admitted.
MR. STRANG: And Mr. Kratz had 217, and I won't have any objection to that either if he wishes that in.
MR. KRATZ: Perhaps at the end of the day, Judge, we can do a -- an accounting of what hasn't been received yet, and we'll make that motion, but we are prepared with our next witness.
THE COURT: All right. You may call your next witness.