Skip to content
personpersonPatrick L. WillisPatrick L. WillisJudge who presided over Steven Avery's 2007 trial.← All People
JudgeCourt

Patrick L. Willis

Judge who presided over Steven Avery's 2007 trial.

AppearedSteven Avery
2,345 lines·213 proceedings

About

Judge Patrick L. Willis presided over Steven Avery's 2007 trial. On Day 1, he accepted Avery's stipulation to the felony-conviction element of the firearm charge after a rights colloquy. When the defense challenged a statement in the prosecution's opening about the presumption of innocence, Willis agreed it was not technically correct and repeated that instruction to the jury before the defense opening.

Willis declined a mistrial over Bobby Dassey's testimony about an alleged remark by Avery, while offering the defense more time and options for cross-examination. Later, he allowed the State's EDTA expert opinions and denied requests for reconsideration and sequential independent testing. On Day 21, he denied renewed fair-testing and search-suppression motions but dismissed the false-imprisonment charge for insufficient evidence.

Willis also addressed juror service and the instructions governing deliberations. He denied a motion to strike a juror who had served in an earlier civil trial involving Detective Dave Remiker, later questioned seated jurors about possible exposure to publicity and outside contact, and approved a defense-theory instruction while declining separate exhibit-weight and spoliation instructions. He instructed the jury on the three remaining charges and Avery's right not to testify. After a juror was excused for a family emergency, he instructed the substituted alternate and the other jurors to begin deliberations anew.

On Day 27, Willis read the jury's verdicts and polled the jurors. The jury found Avery guilty of first-degree intentional homicide and firearm possession and not guilty of mutilating a corpse. Willis discharged the jurors with guidance on discussing the case, then entered convictions on the two guilty counts and an acquittal on the third. He ordered a presentence report and revoked bail; the post-verdict exchange did not set a deadline or hearing date for defense motions.

Trial Record (213)

AverySteven AveryFeb 12, 2007 – Mar 18, 2007

Judge Patrick L. Willis presided over Steven Avery's 2007 trial, ruling on evidence, juror, and instruction issues before entering judgments on the jury's verdicts: convictions for homicide and firearm possession and an acquittal on mutilating a corpse.

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

Day 9

Day 10

Day 11

Day 12

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

Day 19

Day 20

Day 21

ProceduralRulings on fair testing, search suppression, and charge dismissal1highlight6lines spoken

Summary

The court denied renewed fair-testing and search-suppression motions, but dismissed the false-imprisonment charge for insufficient evidence.

Highlights (1)

Quote“The Court concludes that those facts do not demonstrate a finding of bad faith on the part of any representatives of the State.”— Patrick L. WillisStates the finding underlying the denial of renewed fair-testing relief.Open in transcript →

Day 22

Charge ConferenceFormal Jury Instruction Conference1highlight35lines spoken

Summary

The court approved a defense-theory instruction, denied separate exhibit-weight and spoliation instructions, and agreed to add prior-statement language to the jury instructions.

Highlights (1)

Quote“the Court concludes that there is sufficient evidence in the record to justify the giving of a theory of defense instruction.”— Patrick L. WillisThe court's central ruling on whether the jury would receive the defense theory.Open in transcript →

Day 23

Day 24

Day 25

Day 26

Day 27

ProceduralJudgments on verdicts and post-trial orders1highlight6lines spoken

Summary

Judge Willis entered convictions on Counts 1 and 3 and an acquittal on Count 2, ordered a presentence report, and revoked bail. Post-trial scheduling remained open.

Highlights (1)

Quote“The Court is going to, at this time, enter a judgment on the three verdicts that have been received, subject to further rulings from the Court after full consideration of any post-trial motions; that is, a judgment of conviction on Counts 1 and 3 and a judgment of acquittal on Count 2.”— Patrick L. WillisThe court entered judgments while expressly leaving room for later rulings on post-trial motions.Open in transcript →